Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Feature request: Extra params to iterators #7

Open
craigrileyuk opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Feature request: Extra params to iterators #7

craigrileyuk opened this issue Sep 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@craigrileyuk
Copy link

Presently, the callbacks passed to iterators receive only one argument: vnode.

It'd be very helpful if these all received the standard Javascript arguments, namely: (item, index, array)

See: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/map#callbackfn

One usage example might be for addProps where you might want to conditionally apply a prop dependent on where it is in the array.

@skirtles-code
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the feature request!

This is something that a couple of people have suggested to me previously, so it is something I'd like to address, but it isn't quite as simple as it first appears.

There isn't an underlying array that'd be equivalent to the array used by the native JS methods.

For example, if you consider this template:

<ChildComponent>
  <div v-for="i in 3">{{ i }}</div>
  <hr>
  <p v-for="i in 3">{{ i }}</p>
</ChildComponent>

Inside ChildComponent, the slot will yield VNodes with a structure like this:

[
  [<div>1</div>, <div>2</div>, <div>3</div>],
  <hr>,
  [<p>1</p>, <p>2</p>, <p>3</p>]
]

Here I've used arrays to represent the nested fragment VNodes.

The structure is a tree, rather than a flat array. That structure makes it more difficult to work with, but it's also important for Vue to be able to perform updates accurately.

The iterators in vue-vnode-utils try to ease the pain of walking and manipulating that tree, but without actually flattening it. So the tree above will behave as though it is iterating a flat array, like:

[
  <div>1</div>,
  <div>2</div>,
  <div>3</div>,
  <hr>,
  <p>1</p>,
  <p>2</p>,
  <p>3</p>
]

But that array doesn't actually exist, and it would be extra work to create it and pass it to the iterators.

The concept of an index isn't well-defined either. For iterating a tree structure there are two distinct concepts: count and path. The count would just increment by 1 for each node passed to the callback, whereas the path would indicate the position within the tree. Using the example above, the first <p> node would have a count of 4 and a path of [2, 0].

Further complicating matters, there are other pieces of information that someone might want, such as access to the parent node.

As it wasn't clear what extra information should be passed, I decided to stick to just the VNode.

Implementing a count is relatively straightforward to do externally, e.g. See the accordion example at https://skirtles-code.github.io/vue-vnode-utils/examples.html#adding-component-v-model. That works fine for cases that need the position from the beginning of the iteration, but less well in cases that need to know the position from the end of iteration (as the total count isn't known).

I've got some ideas for how to proceed here, trying to add access to some of this 'iteration meta' without negatively impacting performance or bundle size, but I'd be interested to gather any further thoughts you might have on use cases first.

@skirtles-code skirtles-code added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants