We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
This would provide a strict equivalent of attrs behaviour. But for which usage ?
attrs
I would rather enable this only for classes that are read-only, so that the behaviour is intuitive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of now there is no concept in python for descriptors with only a __set__ method and no __get__. (we should maybe make a pep :) )
__set__
__get__
So we're left with putting that in the constructor... which is exactly what attrs does, and would break the "isolation" philosophy. So won't fix
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This would provide a strict equivalent of
attrs
behaviour. But for which usage ?I would rather enable this only for classes that are read-only, so that the behaviour is intuitive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: