Skip to content

Document configuration property binding's support for using @Name to customize a property name #41585

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wilkinsona opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
status: forward-port An issue tracking the forward-port of a change made in an earlier branch type: documentation A documentation update
Milestone

Comments

@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member

Forward port of issue #41577 to 3.3.x.

@LoganDev99
Copy link

LoganDev99 commented Dec 30, 2024

@wilkinsona I don't think this has been properly merged in to the release. I don't see the changes in the source code for version 3.3.3.

When I try to use @Name on my field I get compile issue.

@Name not applicable to field

image

@wilkinsona
Copy link
Member Author

This issue is unrelated to using @Name on a field, support for which was added in 3.4

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
status: forward-port An issue tracking the forward-port of a change made in an earlier branch type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants