You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I currently see something that may be confusing. But it comes from MENO so I think it makes sense to do a cross-issue there. Falling is defined as
Falling is an energy transformation in which gravitational potential energy is transformed into kintetic energy
Intituitively, and I think ontologically, Falling is a negative change of position in relation to the surface (core?) of the earth. And here we are claiming that it is only an energy transformation.
But I think with MENOs model we do not need to do these suspicious claims. Using MENOs energy transformation mereology we can define falling as the process everyone is familiar with, and we can define its part relations to a loss of potential energy and gain of kinetic energy. This way, we are less likely to have future interoperability issues with skydiving ontologies 😉
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Copy paste from: OpenEnergyPlatform/ontology#2022 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: