-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add filename checking for visudo -f #255
Comments
The problem with this is that visudo has no way of knowing that you are editing a file that will be included via @includedir. |
Would it have been useful if "visudo -c" warned about files it was ignoring? |
It certainly would have been useful to have "visudo -c" report on that! Sort of the sudo equivalent of an "apachectl configtest" or similar. I hear you on the fact that visudo has no way to know whether a file is being included via @includedir. Are there circumstances where one might be editing something not in @includedir? That definitely seems like an edge case. Ultimately this was a once-in-a-career mistake for me, but if I can help save others some time, it'd be really nice. |
I just pushed changes to "visudo -c" that may help with this:
My concern with warning about editing any file with a '.' in it is that given a sudoers with a line like:
I don't think visudo should warn for:
|
Hi folks,
After banging my head against a sudo issue for a couple of hours, I finally traced it back to... my sudoers.d file having a period in it. Any chance that a check could be added to
visudo -f
to warn people if they're editing a file that will be ignored?I may be able to fix this myself, but getting the issue filed so I don't forget about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: