Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

If fuse-overlayfs is used with a writable overlay, it should always be used in future. #3177

Open
dtrudg opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@dtrudg
Copy link
Member

dtrudg commented Aug 6, 2024

Version of Singularity

main / 4.1

Describe the bug

While investigating #3176 it has become apparent that my understanding of native overlay vs fuse-overlayfs compatibility is incorrect. Even where xattr support and creation of 0:0 char devices is available, fuse-overlayfs can create overlays that will not mount with the same content under native overlayfs.

When checking whether a directory is opaque, fuse-overlayfs inspects things in the following order:

  • native overlay privileged xattr
  • native overlay unpriviliged xattr
  • fuse-overlayfs xattr
  • presence of .wh..wh..opq file.

When creating an opaque directory, fuse-overlayfs:

  • Tries to set the native overlay privileged xattr
  • If this fails, tries to set the fuse-overlayfs xattr
  • always creates a .wh..wh..opq file

Note that the native overlay unprivileged xattr is never set... so if fuse-overlayfs is used in a context where the unprivileged xattr would be set by native overlayfs, then it will generate a filesystem incompatible with native overlayfs.

@dtrudg dtrudg added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 6, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant