We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
(anonymous) ✖ should be equivalent at Test.<anonymous> (...) <green>actual</green> <red>expected</red> { a: <red>fals</red><green>tru</green>e, b: false }
I think the output for objects that are not equal has potential for being improved.
It would be nice with something more like:
{ a: true, // actual a: false, // expected b: false, }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@tjconcept checkout https://github.com/tap-format/spec and see if that has better formatting for. It's the successor to this library and, in my opinion, is much nicer.
Let me know.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@scottcorgan you linked me to this very same repository?
Ha, whoops. I was so used to tap-spec getting issues like this.
tap-spec
I agree the object output could be better then. I'd love to see any ideas you might have as far is implementation.
I sadly don't have the time currently, but I'll leave it here if someone pops by and wants to contribute.
No branches or pull requests
I think the output for objects that are not equal has potential for being improved.
It would be nice with something more like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: