Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

ConstMap and ConstSet #3

Closed
littledan opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

ConstMap and ConstSet #3

littledan opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@littledan
Copy link
Member

It may be useful to have deeply immutable Map and Set types. Should these be included in this proposal? Or a follow-on?

@rricard
Copy link
Member

rricard commented Apr 4, 2019

I thought about it, I was planning in doing them as followup

@ckknight
Copy link

They don't seem strictly necessary right now, as they could be represented (possibly suboptimally) as const arrays. Having ConstMap and ConstSet as a follow-on proposal seems like the best course of action. Including them this early could potentially lock one into an object creation syntax no one likes.

@mheiber
Copy link
Contributor

mheiber commented Aug 14, 2019

The README now mentions const Map and Set as things that can be explored in a follow-on: https://github.com/rricard/proposal-const-value-types#are-there-any-follow-up-proposals-being-considered

Can we close this issue?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants