You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After talking with @technosophos on Slack, it became clear to us that what we're trying to do here leads to some awkward configurations for more complex charts (e.g. see the deployment in https://gist.github.com/prydonius/30747d0bbee3487b1b67b4454d65b423 - there's a mix of stuff in values.yaml and awkward syntax is the deployment itself). It works nice for the simple cases like services, but quickly becomes more difficult if you need to do stuff with values in the resources.
We're thinking it might be better to take a lighter approach, rather than try to abstract away the full Kubernetes objects, we can just create a bunch of helper functions for reducing boilerplate for common snippets like labels, volumes, resources, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After talking with @technosophos on Slack, it became clear to us that what we're trying to do here leads to some awkward configurations for more complex charts (e.g. see the deployment in https://gist.github.com/prydonius/30747d0bbee3487b1b67b4454d65b423 - there's a mix of stuff in values.yaml and awkward syntax is the deployment itself). It works nice for the simple cases like services, but quickly becomes more difficult if you need to do stuff with values in the resources.
We're thinking it might be better to take a lighter approach, rather than try to abstract away the full Kubernetes objects, we can just create a bunch of helper functions for reducing boilerplate for common snippets like labels, volumes, resources, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: