Added a section explaining why a fork was created.

[almet]

I was wondering why the fork was created, so dropped over IRC had approximately
this answer, that I rephrased and put in a pull request.

I'm actually not sure about the part where I say decisions are taken
collegially, but I would love to see this a reality :-)

Please, don't hesitate to add some more information there in the comments,
I will integrate them in the pull request and hopefully everything will be
merged to master at some point.

[MaxLeiter]

But of a nitpick, but maybe “Why the fork?” sounds better?

[almet]

Thanks, I updated accordingly.

[astorije]

s/«The Lounge»/"The Lounge"/ :-)

[astorije]

@almet, thanks for this!
On top of the 2 comments I left you inline, could you squash your commits please? I should be 👍 then, but the second reviewer for this should be a native speaker ideally.

[dgw]

"more streamlined—and ideally quicker."

Thoughts, @astorije?

[astorije]

I would not use words like "should" or "ideally" here actually, but more like "goal(s)", "intent", more present tense. But maybe that doesn't make any sense and therefore you should ignore this comment :-)

[dgw]

Maybe then, "the review process quicker and more streamlined."

[astorije]

👍

[dgw]

I'm not technically a reviewer, but I am a native English speaker. 😼

Left a couple inline comments of my own. If I was a reviewer, I'd give this a 👍 after @astorije's comments are addressed.

[almet]

updated and squashed.

[MaxLeiter]

A bunch of people, excited about doing things a bit differently than the upstream
project forked it under a new name: “The Lounge”

A bunch of people, excited about doing things a bit differently than the upstream
project, forked Shout under a new name: “The Lounge”

This fork aims to be community managed

The fork aims to be community managed

Some of my thoughts ^

[astorije]

Thanks for your thoughts @MaxLeiter but I believe this is good as is :-)

@almet, 👍, thanks for this!

[xPaw]

👍