Assemblies are not Strong Named

[maggarwal]

Hi,

I am unable to use this library as it is not strong named. Is it possible for you to publish a strong named version or strong name the package by default?

[thomaslevesque]

Hi @maggarwal,

For a while, the consensus in the C# OSS community was to not strong-name assemblies, so I didn't. However, this seems to have changed; Microsoft now recommends strong-naming open-source libraries. So I think I will do so at some point, but it won't happen overnight.

In the meantime, you can use https://github.com/brutaldev/StrongNameSigner to strong-name third-party assemblies yourself.

[thomaslevesque]

Adding this to vNext milestone. I've started strong-naming some of my libraries a while ago, and I see no reason not to do it for this one.

[thomaslevesque]

This is fixed in 2.0.0-beta.1