Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Partition GFS_init.F90 #2524

Open
dustinswales opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Partition GFS_init.F90 #2524

dustinswales opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@scrasmussen
Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature-MPAS Label to identify tasks associated with the MPAS dynamical core implementation

Comments

@dustinswales
Copy link
Collaborator

dustinswales commented Dec 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

GFS_init.F90 is responsible for reading in the physics namelist(s) and initializing the data containers used within the physics. This could be partitioned into dynamical core agnostic/specific pieces, which could be a single module guarded with dynamical core specific pre-processor directives (PPD), or into agnostic/specific modules.

Solution

One option, using the dycore pre-processor directives, MPAS and FV3, partition GFS_init into:
ccpp/driver/GFS_init.F90 - Common initialization + dycore specific initialization guarded by PPD
ccpp/driver/GFS_FV3_init.F90 - FV3 specific initialization imported
ccpp/driver/GFS_MPAS_init.F90 - MPAS specific initialization
@dustinswales dustinswales self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@dustinswales dustinswales added enhancement New feature or request feature-MPAS Label to identify tasks associated with the MPAS dynamical core implementation labels Dec 3, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees

@scrasmussen scrasmussen

Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature-MPAS Label to identify tasks associated with the MPAS dynamical core implementation
Projects
MPAS dycore in the UFS Weather Model
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@scrasmussen @dustinswales