You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear developers, I would like to ask a question about the safety factor output during the model operation, which is as follows:I planned to use TRIGRS (version 2.1.00a) to test the instability of my study area with different rainfall changes, but found a very serious error problem in it. I set two different rainfall processes, the first is: 30mm on the first day (Fs output at 86400s), 0mm on the second day; The second type is: 0mm on the first day and 30mm on the second day (Fs output at 172800s), I think the results of the two outputs should be the same or similar, but the actual situation is that the output result of the second output at 172800s is the same as that at the initial time when there is no rain (rarely instability of the grid), but the output result of the first output at 86400s is the same as that of the first output at 86400s.However, I found a lot of raster instability, I can't explain the results reasonably, is there something wrong with the model compilation or parameter setting?Much bother, looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear developers, I would like to ask a question about the safety factor output during the model operation, which is as follows:I planned to use TRIGRS (version 2.1.00a) to test the instability of my study area with different rainfall changes, but found a very serious error problem in it. I set two different rainfall processes, the first is: 30mm on the first day (Fs output at 86400s), 0mm on the second day; The second type is: 0mm on the first day and 30mm on the second day (Fs output at 172800s), I think the results of the two outputs should be the same or similar, but the actual situation is that the output result of the second output at 172800s is the same as that at the initial time when there is no rain (rarely instability of the grid), but the output result of the first output at 86400s is the same as that of the first output at 86400s.However, I found a lot of raster instability, I can't explain the results reasonably, is there something wrong with the model compilation or parameter setting?Much bother, looking forward to your reply.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: