You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Seattle fault is modeled as having three possible strands in the geologic model; only the northern strand is included with the geodetic source models (see nshmp-haz-fortran #32).
In the geologic model, the characteristic rate of the northern strand is assigned the a-priori 5000yr. rate and the middle and southern strands are assigned a negligible 10-million year rate. The GR rates for all three strands, however, are equal. Why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Per @haller-usgs:
We made the change to three traces in 2008. Those records show that the middle and northern were only gr input, like the attached. seattleFZ.txt
pmpowers-usgs
changed the title
Seattle fault weights
Seattle fault weights and rates
Nov 8, 2017
Given the complexity of estimating the recurrence rate on the Seattle Fault and variants, it was decided not to use geodetic slip rates. However, perhaps they should be considered, for consistency with all other WUS faults, possibly while imposing rate maxima in the geodetic inversions.
The Seattle fault is modeled as having three possible strands in the geologic model; only the northern strand is included with the geodetic source models (see nshmp-haz-fortran #32).
In the geologic model, the characteristic rate of the northern strand is assigned the a-priori 5000yr. rate and the middle and southern strands are assigned a negligible 10-million year rate. The GR rates for all three strands, however, are equal. Why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: