Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Seattle fault weights and rates #17

Closed
pmpowers-usgs opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Seattle fault weights and rates #17

pmpowers-usgs opened this issue Jan 5, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member

The Seattle fault is modeled as having three possible strands in the geologic model; only the northern strand is included with the geodetic source models (see nshmp-haz-fortran #32).

In the geologic model, the characteristic rate of the northern strand is assigned the a-priori 5000yr. rate and the middle and southern strands are assigned a negligible 10-million year rate. The GR rates for all three strands, however, are equal. Why?

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

Per @haller-usgs:
We made the change to three traces in 2008. Those records show that the middle and northern were only gr input, like the attached.
seattleFZ.txt

@pmpowers-usgs pmpowers-usgs changed the title Seattle fault weights Seattle fault weights and rates Nov 8, 2017
@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

Given the complexity of estimating the recurrence rate on the Seattle Fault and variants, it was decided not to use geodetic slip rates. However, perhaps they should be considered, for consistency with all other WUS faults, possibly while imposing rate maxima in the geodetic inversions.

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

The Seattle and other exceptional faults will be revisited in the next update to the geodetic models.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants