Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Inconsistent clamping of maximum ground motions. #54

Closed
pmpowers-usgs opened this issue May 9, 2016 · 2 comments · Fixed by #56
Closed

Inconsistent clamping of maximum ground motions. #54

pmpowers-usgs opened this issue May 9, 2016 · 2 comments · Fixed by #56
Assignees

Comments

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member

pmpowers-usgs commented May 9, 2016

clamp-notes.xlsx
This is a recurring issue that was thought to be resolved, but apparently wasn't, as demonstrated during nshmp-haz verification. From the 2008 and 2014 OFR's:

The ground-motion distribution for peak ground acceleration is truncated at 3 g and for 0.2-s spectral acceleration at 6 g, when these values are less than the 3-sigma cutoff.

Although this guidance is only meant to cover the primary periods supported with each official map release (PGA, 5-Hz, and 1-Hz), per conversations with Steve Harmsen and code comments, OpenSHA dev implementations of the 2008 NSHMP, and the new nshmp-haz codes apply a model that clamps PGA at 3g and SAs<0.75s at 6g (see ExceedanceModel.NSHM_CEUS_MAX_INTENSITY; this link may break in the future if ExceedanceModel is refactored to ProbabilityModel).

In practice in the fortran codes, however, hazFXnga13l.f:

  • applies a 3g clamp at 1-Hz (this gives rise to significant discrepancies in the immediate vicinity of New Madrid (see attached image).
  • includes clamp arrays in Campbell and Toro GMMs that should be commented out in favor of the global array.

and hazgridXnga13l.f

  • applies short period clamps inconsistent with other GMMs in the the three new (for 2014) models: AB06p, A08p, and Pez11.
  • applies a clamp of 3g at 0.5s in Campbell

See attached spreadsheet for a summary.

hazcurves_us_bc_760_new_madrid_mo_1hz

clamp-notes.xlsx

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

pmpowers-usgs commented May 9, 2016

Nothing anywhere indicates that the hazFXnga13l.f clamp at 1-Hz should be 3g (instead of 0 -- no clamp); changing to 0.0 and will revert if Harmsen or Frankel provide a compelling reason to revert back. Would then make the case to change all 1-Hz clamps in hazgridXnga13l.f

It remains to be seen if this has a significant effect on 2% to 10% in 50-year ground motions.

@pmpowers-usgs
Copy link
Member Author

Clamping fixes were mistakenly made to parallel version of hazFX.
1.5s clamp also needs to be changed to 0.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant