Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

ci: Update bfs to 4.0 #446

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2024
Merged

ci: Update bfs to 4.0 #446

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2024

Conversation

tavianator
Copy link
Contributor

And fix diff-bfs.sh for the new test result format.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.47%. Comparing base (d9d2a4e) to head (bcaea4f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #446   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.47%   66.47%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        4278     4278           
  Branches      958      958           
=======================================
  Hits         2844     2844           
  Misses       1041     1041           
  Partials      393      393           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Commit 0492e01 has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test  57 / 288 is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed:  70 / 317.  70 / 317 is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70

And fix diff-bfs.sh for the new test result format.
Copy link

Commit bcaea4f has GNU testsuite comparison:

Run GNU findutils tests: GNU tests summary = TOTAL: 659 / PASS: 477 / FAIL: 179 / ERROR: 2
Run GNU findutils tests: Changes from main: PASS +0 / FAIL +0 / ERROR +0 / SKIP +0 
Run GNU findutils tests: Gnu tests No changes
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/HLP. common/HLP is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus. common/gid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_minus_plus. common/gid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus. common/gid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/gid_plus_plus. common/gid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test common/name_slashes is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus. common/uid_minus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_minus_plus. common/uid_minus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus. common/uid_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: common/uid_plus_plus. common/uid_plus_plus is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/gid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: bfs test failed: gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop. gnu/ignore_readdir_race_loop is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_minus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Congrats! The bfs test gnu/uid_plus_plus is now passing!
Run BFS tests: Changes from main: PASS +11 / SKIP +5 / FAIL +13
Run BFS tests: BFS tests summary = TOTAL: 317 / PASS: 241 / SKIP: 6 / FAIL: 70

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit abf851d into uutils:main Aug 17, 2024
19 checks passed
@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants