Feature Request: Add Alibaba Cloud Qwen Model Support.

[baraich]

Feature Description

Qwen2.5 Passed Deekseek

I am also a developer, I could have done that however, I am also unaware of the code structure of the project and have to focus on upcoming 12 exams other if this in pending after 03 March, 2025. I am happy to assigned this project.

Use Cases

None, like other models.

Additional context

None.

[mkbctrl]

Deekseek sounds weird, just saying...

[mkbctrl]

Did you look into createOpenAICompatible method? Since they claim they are OpenAI compatible in the docs, it might help you: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/developer-reference/compatible-with-openai/?spm=a2c63.p38356.0.i1

It look like we are on the same boat here, this is my latest "discovery" around this subject, I am trying to make it work as we speak.

[baraich]

Deekseek sounds weird, just saying...

I am unable to understand the following message. Please elaborate on the idea further.

[baraich]

Did you look into createOpenAICompatible method? Since they claim they are OpenAI compatible in the docs, it might help you: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/developer-reference/compatible-with-openai/?spm=a2c63.p38356.0.i1

It look like we are on the same boat here, this is my latest "discovery" around this subject, I am trying to make it work as we speak.

The main reason I wanted to share the though of adding support for Qwen models is to help shape ai sdk into a monopoly, spreading an idea amongst others as a default option for AI integration to application.

I haven't seen their docs yet. I am actually under a situation that does not allow me explore things. As, I mentioned earlier, I am currently preparing for upcoming board examinations.

However, addition or not of this feature does not affect me in any way as I can always go with custom code, however, I think having a wide of options available is nice to have.

[mkbctrl]

Deekseek sounds weird, just saying...

I am unable to understand the following message. Please elaborate on the idea further.

You have a typo in the name that sounds funny when spoken out loud: DeekSeek => DeepSeek

[baraich]

Deekseek sounds weird, just saying...

I am unable to understand the following message. Please elaborate on the idea further.

You have a typo in the name that sounds funny when spoken out loud: DeekSeek => DeepSeek

Oh. However, I guess we can keep it how it is. A reminder.

[franklin007ban2]

There is already a DeepSeek provider here

https://github.com/vercel/ai/tree/main/packages/deepseek

Is this what you want?

[baraich]

There is already a DeepSeek provider here

https://github.com/vercel/ai/tree/main/packages/deepseek

Is this what you want?

Please carefully read and understand the context. The proposal was to add support for Qwen models. Deepseek models support was present before this proposal.

I guess Qwen models could work with OpenAILike helper mentioned above by @mkbctrl.