-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Feature: Custom favicon #356
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 9.x #356 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 68.16% 68.16%
=======================================
Files 29 29
Lines 1401 1401
Branches 203 203
=======================================
Hits 955 955
Misses 406 406
Partials 40 40
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
We have a problem ... @sergiohgz ship this under 10.x is not viable now ... |
Let me create a maintenance branch and move this there |
The base branch was changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to rebase, I changed the base branch
fac6204
to
edd6d1a
Compare
Done |
As I remember, we could deploy from any maintenance branch (N.x or M.N.x), and master branch. By the way, you are correct, we might change default branch (rename current master to next and make 9.x new master) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still LGTM 😉, let's wait for @juanpicado review
released as |
See verdaccio/verdaccio#1787