Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2023. It is now read-only.

[SUGGESTION] Migrating config from params.sc.<tool>.* to params.tools.<tool>.* #310

Closed
22 tasks done
dweemx opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #358
Closed
22 tasks done

[SUGGESTION] Migrating config from params.sc.<tool>.* to params.tools.<tool>.* #310

dweemx opened this issue Feb 12, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #358
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@dweemx
Copy link
Contributor

dweemx commented Feb 12, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not related to a problem.
The goal is to unify and to improve the config structure by moving from params.sc.<tool>.* to params.tools.<tool>.*.
Important:

  • This new config schema should be backward compatible!
  • This will be a breaking change: the old configs will likely not work anymore
  • Several params entries have moved to the params.utils scope: scope, cell_annotate, cell_filter, file_converter, file_concatenator, file_cleaner, sample_annotate, star_concatenator

Tools:

  • celda
  • cellranger
  • directs
  • dropletutils
  • dropseqtools
  • fastp
  • flybaser
  • harmony
  • pcacv
  • picard
  • popscle (previously done)
  • pycistopic (previously done)
  • scanpy
  • scenic
  • scrublet
  • singlecelltoolkit (previously done)
  • sinto (previously done)
  • soupx
  • sratoolkit
  • star
  • trimgalore (previously done)
  • utils

Describe the solution you'd like
/

Describe alternatives you've considered
/
Additional context
/

@dweemx dweemx added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 12, 2021
@dweemx dweemx self-assigned this Feb 12, 2021
@dweemx dweemx added this to the 0.27.0 milestone Feb 18, 2021
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant