We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
As I was browsing through the Parquet code recently, I noticed that we depend on lzo where the Node bindings are MIT licensed but the underlying C library is GPL2. See schroffl/node-lzo#12
lzo
According to Wes Mckinney, apache/arrow#2209 (comment)
LZO isn't really used anymore (as soon as Snappy came around people largely stopped using it because of the *GPL licensing issues)
Just thought it would be worthwhile to make an issue about this while I was thinking about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was trying to add LZO as an optional dependency but I suppose in that case we really should explain the licensing situation to users.
I am very open to removing LZO in 3.2. Supporting LZO on browsers will require a bunch of work anyways, and it is a huge dependency.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
As I was browsing through the Parquet code recently, I noticed that we depend on
lzo
where the Node bindings are MIT licensed but the underlying C library is GPL2. See schroffl/node-lzo#12According to Wes Mckinney, apache/arrow#2209 (comment)
Just thought it would be worthwhile to make an issue about this while I was thinking about it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: