This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By defining the environment variable
RESTIC_PROGRESS_FPS
it is possible to reduce restic's output.The reason to introduce this change is that we suspect that the buffer of the scanner is eventually filling up. This PR does not fix that permanently, but it reduces the output of restic dramatically, which should at least should delay the occurence of such errors until a more permament is found.
Also, wrestic does not need the progress to be reported every 1/60th of a second.
The behavior now – as implemented – is that if
RESTIC_PROGRESS_FPS
is defined in the environment variables that are passed towrestic
, the given value will be used. Otherwise,wrestic
will set the value to about one progress report line per minute (i.e.1.0f/60.0f per Second
).Originally discussed in #79 (comment).