fix(core): fix defineReactive unnecessary getters call fix #7280 #7302
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The defineReactive gets the property of the object, only if it has no getter fix vuejs#7280
dsonet
reviewed
Dec 23, 2017
src/core/observer/index.js
Outdated
| @@ -145,6 +145,9 @@ export function defineReactive ( | |||
|
|
|||
| // cater for pre-defined getter/setters | |||
| const getter = property && property.get | |||
| if (!getter && arguments.length <= 2) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If so, it's better to be arguments.length === 2.
13 tasks
This was referenced Mar 14, 2018
f2009
pushed a commit
to f2009/vue
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2019
aJean
pushed a commit
to aJean/vue
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2020
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The defineReactive gets the property of the object, only if it has no getter
fix #7280
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check at least one)
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one)
If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:
The PR fulfills these requirements:
devbranch for v2.x (or to a previous version branch), not themasterbranchfix #xxx[,#xxx], where "xxx" is the issue number)If adding a new feature, the PR's description includes:
Other information: