Impact
Due to missing overflow check for loop variables, by assigning the iterator of a loop to a variable, it is possible to overflow the type of the latter.
In the following example, calling test
returns 354
, meaning that the variable a
did store 354
a value out of bound for the type uint8
.
@external
def test() -> uint16:
x:uint8 = 255
a:uint8 = 0
for i in range(x, x+100):
a = i
return convert(a,uint16)
The issue seems to happen only in loops of type for i in range(a, a + N)
as in loops of type for i in range(start, stop)
and for i in range(stop)
, the compiler is able to raise a TypeMismatch
when trying to overflow the variable.
thanks to @trocher for reporting
Patches
patched in 3de1415
Workarounds
Impact
Due to missing overflow check for loop variables, by assigning the iterator of a loop to a variable, it is possible to overflow the type of the latter.
In the following example, calling
test
returns354
, meaning that the variablea
did store354
a value out of bound for the typeuint8
.The issue seems to happen only in loops of type
for i in range(a, a + N)
as in loops of typefor i in range(start, stop)
andfor i in range(stop)
, the compiler is able to raise aTypeMismatch
when trying to overflow the variable.thanks to @trocher for reporting
Patches
patched in 3de1415
Workarounds