Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Missing terms #36

Open
ektrah opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Missing terms #36

ektrah opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@ektrah
Copy link
Member

ektrah commented Feb 10, 2025

The Turtle files currently found at https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns and https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema contain a few terms that are not currently mentioned in rdf-schema.

It is understood that not all terms with the same namespace IRI necessarily need to be defined in the same document. However, from a "specification usability" point of view, it would be immensely helpful if all terms of the rdf: and rdfs: vocabularies could be found in one place - even if that then just points to another document.

The terms currently in the Turtle files but not mentioned in the spec are:

  • rdf:PlainLiteral
  • rdf:CompoundLiteral
  • rdf:language
  • rdf:direction

Specifically for rdf:CompoundLiteral, rdf:language, and rdf:direction, it would also be very helpful to point out how they relate to the directional language-tagged strings of RDF 1.2. (E.g., should [ ex:title [ rdf:value "HTML و CSS: تصميم و إنشاء مواقع الويب", rdf:language "ar-eg", rdf:direction "rtl" ] ] and [ ex:title "HTML و CSS: تصميم و إنشاء مواقع الويب"@ar-eg--rtl ] be treated as equivalent?)

@domel
Copy link
Contributor

domel commented Feb 10, 2025

See
#30
#33

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants