Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

MSE-in-Workers #656

Closed
wolenetz opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

MSE-in-Workers #656

wolenetz opened this issue Jun 30, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Topic: media Venue: Media WG

Comments

@wolenetz
Copy link

Ya ya yawm TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of MSE-in-Workers.

Enable Media Source Extensions (MSE) API usage from DedicatedWorker contexts to enable improved performance of buffering media for playback by an HTMLMediaElement on the main Window context. By creating a MediaSource object on a DedicatedWorker context, an application may then create an ObjectURL for it and postMessage that URL to the main thread for use in attaching to an HTMLMediaElement. The context that created the MediaSource object may then use it to buffer media.

Further details:

  • [ x ] I have reviewed the TAG's Web Platform Design Principles
  • Relevant time constraints or deadlines: This feature is expected to be part of the MSE v2 specification, whose editor's draft will be entering FPWD soon.
  • The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: https://www.w3.org/media-wg/
  • The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): https://www.w3.org/media-wg/
  • Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: None.
  • This work is being funded by: N/A

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:

🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for each point of feedback, with issue title prefix "MSE-in-Workers:".

@torgo torgo changed the title MSE-in-Workers TAG review request MSE-in-Workers Jul 21, 2021
@atanassov
Copy link

@hober and I looked at this proposal during our Gethen virtual f2f. The explainer and security & privacy questionnaire are really easy to follow. We especially appreciated the open questions discussion and the overall clarity of the explainer.

We are happy to close the review as satisfied. Good luck in further experimentations in shipping the feature alongside the Media WG. Thank you for working with us.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Resolution: satisfied The TAG is satisfied with this design Topic: media Venue: Media WG
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants