Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Feature]: Support for Module Federation #212

Closed
Tracked by #46
chenjiahan opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #240
Closed
Tracked by #46

[Feature]: Support for Module Federation #212

chenjiahan opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #240
Assignees

Comments

@chenjiahan
Copy link
Member

What problem does this feature solve?

Allow Rslib to create Module Federation remote module.

What does the proposed API look like?

I have created a demo (https://github.com/chenjiahan/rslib-mf) to try out the ModuleFederationPlugin in Rslib, and I find that the format: 'esm' breaks the output of Module Federation, so Rslib should provide a new format for Module Federation, such as format: 'module-federation' or format: 'none'.

@Timeless0911
Copy link
Collaborator

I prefer format: 'module-federation', since format: 'none' seems a bit ambiguous.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants