Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix: styleTagTransform function path added to buildDependencies #528

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2021

Conversation

cap-Bernardito
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

When the styleTagTransform option is an absolute path to a function, it is added to the buildDependencies

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #528 (acb8280) into master (a0ee2e0) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #528      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.93%   94.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         296      297       +1     
  Branches      146      146              
==========================================
+ Hits          281      282       +1     
  Misses         15       15              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/utils.js 92.90% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a0ee2e0...acb8280. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 270513f into master Jul 20, 2021
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the fix-styletagtransform-build-deps branch July 20, 2021 15:55
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants