Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

感觉和dubbo差不多啊 #13

Closed
simpleSOA opened this issue Apr 25, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

感觉和dubbo差不多啊 #13

simpleSOA opened this issue Apr 25, 2016 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@simpleSOA
Copy link

首先非常感谢motan开源,顺便请问一下,看了下demo代码,感觉和dubbo差不多,请问motan和dubbo相比有什么优势?

@superleo-cn
Copy link

确实差不多。最主要还是dubbo官方早就不维护了,如果将来这个motan周边配套都成熟了,迁移也方便了。

@qdaxb
Copy link
Collaborator

qdaxb commented Apr 26, 2016

Dubbo 功能上比较丰富,与 Dubbo 的分层来对比,Motan 的模块层次要更简单一些,没有 exchange 和 directory 等。从我们压测的结果来看,在我们的业务场景下Motan的性能比dubbo要好一些。

并且像 @superleo-cn 说的,dubbo已经不维护了。

@ccc-rrr
Copy link

ccc-rrr commented Apr 26, 2016

“和dubbo差不多”也能方便、少成本地转移过来。

@qdaxb qdaxb added the question label Apr 26, 2016
@coswind
Copy link

coswind commented Apr 26, 2016

赞一个,层次确实简单明晰

@simpleSOA
Copy link
Author

赞一个,希望不要像dubbo那样坑,生态好了就没人维护了,希望以后Motan能把dubbo干下去

@kazaff
Copy link

kazaff commented Apr 26, 2016

当当的dubbox算是一种dubbo的延续,更新了相关的库版本,增加了rest api等特性。motan的很多依赖技术的选择上和dubbo都一致,是否可以理解成为了性能或代码简洁性而做的一种重构?

@kazaff
Copy link

kazaff commented Apr 26, 2016

@simpleSOA 我觉得dubbo[x]的代码还是有在维护的,而且从社区关注度上来看是很好的

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants