Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Release selection request #205

Open
xmixahlx opened this issue Nov 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Release selection request #205

xmixahlx opened this issue Nov 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Design Design or UX/UI related Feature New feature Needed: discussion More discussion needed before anything can be done (or still no agreement has been reached) Needed: patch A pull request is required Priority: low Low priority Sprintable Small enough to sprint on
Milestone

Comments

@xmixahlx
Copy link

Request to enable simple release selection as entry number instead of the 36 char string.

Example:
"3"
vs
"44a3594a-09d7-4c06-abe7-1d11784786dd"

@drfarmerdave
Copy link

This would be great.
Could I expand this and request that when a release is selected, the track listing is shown to verify correct naming scheme, and the user can confirm/edit this selection.

@RecursiveForest
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to allowing a positional selection option in addition to still accepting the entire release ID.

I think I like the idea of showing the track list for each release as well, something like t <ID> where is either the position ID number or the entire musicbrainz discID, and t simply prints the track listing for all options.

Editing the track tags before ripping is a separate issue entirely, and I think you should appropriate open another issue on github for it, @drfarmerdave .

@JoeLametta JoeLametta added this to the 2.0 milestone Apr 6, 2018
@JoeLametta JoeLametta added Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Priority: low Low priority Design Design or UX/UI related Feature New feature Sprintable Small enough to sprint on Needed: patch A pull request is required Needed: discussion More discussion needed before anything can be done (or still no agreement has been reached) and removed enhancement labels Nov 12, 2018
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Design Design or UX/UI related Feature New feature Needed: discussion More discussion needed before anything can be done (or still no agreement has been reached) Needed: patch A pull request is required Priority: low Low priority Sprintable Small enough to sprint on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants