-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 841
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Hybrid Post Quantum Algorithms #8142
Comments
Hi @Mohre , Great question. We don't currently support this, we do hope to support this in the future but don't have a concrete timeline yet. We can set up a feature request for this if you'd like, please contact us at support [AT] wolfssl [DOT] com to set this up. |
If you are interested in collaborating, I am working on a Pull Request to implement Composite Signatures. Here's the link to the fork I am using (main branch aligned with master in wolfSSL, mldsa-composite-1 is the branch I use to add the composite). Also, you can checkout the Any help/comment/support/feedback is highly appreciated! |
I investigating on PQS algorithms usage with TLS1.3 for communication. |
Hi @Mohre Please do have a look at @opencrypto 's PR. We here at wolfSSL have been following his work and are delighted with his efforts. We do not support Warm regards, Anthony |
Version
5.7.4
Description
I noticed Wolfssl supports these Post Quantum Algorithms.
![wolfssl](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/9305564/382583081-8eff8a38-47ba-455d-85e4-c41fcb495d40.jpeg?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.Lh3jBX-nPJKwdI9FNJlxhnmAU9f7iF6XjPqZGKmLwk4)
MLDSA87-ECDSA-P384-SHA512
mentioned in this draft?MLKEM1024-ECDH-P384
(Something like P384_KYBER_LEVEL5) for standardization.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: