-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Update WDLs for upcoming pVACtools 4.0.0 release #93
Conversation
definitions/tools/pvacfuse.wdl
Outdated
} | ||
|
||
Int space_needed_gb = 10 + round(size([input_fusions_zip], "GB") * 3) | ||
runtime { | ||
preemptible: 1 | ||
maxRetries: 2 | ||
docker: "griffithlab/pvactools:3.1.0" | ||
docker: "susannakiwala/pvactools:4.0.0_rc_pvacview_v3" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just commenting to note that we'll want to replace this with the final release version once it's ready.
35bd35e
to
503054f
Compare
d953d2e
to
9f17ecb
Compare
~{if defined(iedb_retries) then "-r ~{iedb_retries}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if keep_tmp_files then "-k" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(normal_sample_name) then "--normal-sample-name ~{normal_sample_name}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(net_chop_method) then "--net-chop-method ~{net_chop_method}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if netmhc_stab then "--netmhc-stab" else ""} \ | ||
~{if run_reference_proteome_similarity then "--run-reference-proteome-similarity" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(peptide_fasta) then "--peptide-fasta ~{peptide_fasta}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(top_score_metric) then "-m ~{top_score_metric}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(net_chop_threshold) then "--net-chop-threshold ~{net_chop_threshold}" else ""} \ | ||
~{if defined(additional_report_columns) then "-m ~{additional_report_columns}" else ""} \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like -m
is here twice?
This all seems to be working as expected in my test with real datasets. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me and seems to be working as expected.
No description provided.