Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

add linkup actions #15381

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juliette0704
Copy link
Contributor

@juliette0704 juliette0704 commented Jan 23, 2025

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new "Linkup Answer" action for obtaining natural language answers based on user queries.
    • Added a new module for enhanced search functionality with options for search depth.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified search action configuration and error handling.
  • Chores

    • Updated package version to 0.1.1.
    • Streamlined search action parameters by removing unnecessary properties.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

@juliette0704 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 28, 2025 1:52pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new "Linkup Answer" action module in the Linkup component, allowing users to obtain natural language answers based on search queries. The changes include creating a new action module with metadata, defining parameters for query and search depth, and implementing an asynchronous run method with error handling. Additionally, the search action module has been simplified by removing output configuration properties, and the package version has been incrementally updated.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs New module added for Linkup Answer action with metadata, query and depth parameters, and asynchronous run method.
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs Removed outputType, structuredOutputSchema, and includeImages properties; updated version to "0.1.1".
components/linkup/package.json Version updated from "0.1.0" to "0.1.1".
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs New module added for Linkup Sourced functionality with metadata, query and depth parameters, and an asynchronous run method.

Possibly related PRs

  • CustomJS: Add Run Puppoteer and HTML to PNG actions #14117: The changes in the main PR introduce a new module for the "Linkup Answer" action, while this PR updates the "Linkup Search" action, indicating a related focus on enhancing the Linkup API functionalities.
  • Feat/add linkup component #15257: The addition of the Linkup component itself is directly related to the main PR, as it introduces new functionalities for the Linkup API, aligning with the objectives of enhancing user interactions and data retrieval capabilities.
  • [Components] Easy Peasy AI: Added new action components #14190: This PR adds new action components related to Easy Peasy AI, which may share similar objectives in providing enhanced functionalities for user queries, akin to the natural language answers provided by the Linkup Answer action.

Suggested labels

action

Suggested reviewers

  • michelle0927

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of search and might,
Linkup answers shining bright,
Queries dance, depth takes flight,
Knowledge blooms with pure delight,
Code hops forward, wisdom's height! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dylburger dylburger added the User submitted Submitted by a user label Jan 23, 2025
@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified.

@pipedream-component-development
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs (3)

9-25: Reduce code duplication by sharing props with search action.

The props configuration is identical to the search action. Consider extracting these common props to a shared configuration file to maintain DRY principles.

Create a new file components/linkup/common/props.mjs:

export const searchProps = {
  query: {
    type: "string",
    label: "Query",
    description: "The search query for Linkup.",
  },
  depth: {
    type: "string",
    label: "Search Depth",
    description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.",
    options: ["standard", "deep"],
  },
};

Then import and use in both actions:

+import { searchProps } from "../../common/props.mjs";

 export default {
   // ...
   props: {
     app,
-    query: {
-      type: "string",
-      // ...
-    },
-    depth: {
-      type: "string",
-      // ...
-    },
+    ...searchProps,
   },
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure


26-39: Improve error handling and add response validation.

The error handling could be improved by:

  1. Adding specific error types/codes
  2. Validating the response format
  3. Using a more descriptive success message
 async run({ $ }) {
   try {
     const response = await this.app.search({
       query: this.query,
       depth: this.depth,
       outputType: "sourcedAnswer",
     });
+    if (!response || !response.answer) {
+      throw new Error("Invalid response format: missing answer");
+    }
-    $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
+    $.export("$summary", `Successfully generated answer for query: "${this.query}"`);
     return response;
   } catch (error) {
+    const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || error.message;
     console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
-    throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
+    throw new Error(`Failed to generate answer: ${errorMessage}`);
   }
 },
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure


28-32: Consider using the dedicated answer method.

Since we added an answer method in the app file, we should use it here instead of calling search directly with outputType: "sourcedAnswer".

-      const response = await this.app.search({
+      const response = await this.app.answer({
         query: this.query,
         depth: this.depth,
-        outputType: "sourcedAnswer",
       });

This change would justify keeping the answer method in the app file. Otherwise, consider my earlier suggestion to remove it.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c1ae19 and 8e5292d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/linkup/linkup.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (1)

5-5: Document the removal of output configuration options.

The simplified interface with hardcoded outputType: "searchResults" improves usability. However, please document the rationale for removing the output configuration options (outputType, structuredOutputSchema, includeImages) in the PR description to help users understand the changes.

Also applies to: 31-31

Comment on lines 17 to 20
answer(params) {
const client = this._getClient();
return client.search(params);
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider removing redundant method or adding answer-specific logic.

The answer method is currently just a wrapper around the search method without any additional functionality. Either:

  1. Remove this method and use the existing search method directly, or
  2. Add answer-specific logic/transformation to justify its existence.

export default {
name: "Linkup Answer",
description: "Get a natural language answer to your natural language question.",
key: "linkup-search",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix component key to match folder name and resolve pipeline failure.

The component key "linkup-search" conflicts with:

  • Component folder name: answer
  • Component name: "Linkup Answer"

This is causing the pipeline failure. According to the docs, these should all match.

Change the key to "linkup-answer" to resolve the pipeline failure:

-  key: "linkup-search",
+  key: "linkup-answer",
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
key: "linkup-search",
key: "linkup-answer",
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (2)

31-31: Document the hardcoded outputType value.

Since outputType is now hardcoded to "searchResults", please add a code comment explaining:

  1. What output format users should expect
  2. Why this specific type was chosen as the default
  3. What other types might be supported in the future
+        // "searchResults" returns a list of relevant objects in the standard format
         outputType: "searchResults",

Line range hint 1-39: Enhance component to meet Pipedream guidelines.

Please consider the following improvements to align with the component development guidelines:

  1. Add JSDoc documentation for the run method
  2. Consider making depth an optional prop with a default value of "standard"
  3. Implement async options for the query prop to improve user experience

Here's how you could implement these changes:

   props: {
     app,
     query: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Query",
       description: "The search query for Linkup.",
+      async options({ prevContext }) {
+        // Implement typeahead suggestions based on previous searches
+        return this.app.getSuggestedQueries(prevContext);
+      },
     },
     depth: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Search Depth",
       description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.",
+      optional: true,
+      default: "standard",
       options: [
         "standard",
         "deep",
       ],
     },
   },
+  /**
+   * Performs a natural language search using the Linkup API
+   * @param {Object} $ - The event object
+   * @returns {Promise<Object>} The search results
+   * @throws {Error} When the API request fails
+   */
   async run({ $ }) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7138b09 and d6313a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (2 hunks)
  • components/linkup/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/linkup/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (1)

5-5: Great improvement to the description!

The new description is more user-friendly and clearly explains the action's purpose without relying on external documentation references.

key: "linkup-search",
version: "0.0.1",
version: "0.1.1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Version mismatch detected in answer action component

The version numbers are inconsistent across the Linkup component files:

  • components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs is at version "0.0.1"
  • While package.json and search.mjs are at version "0.1.1"
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify version consistency across files.

The version was updated from "0.0.1" to "0.1.1", skipping "0.1.0". Let's ensure version numbers are consistent across all related files.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version numbers in component files
echo "Checking version numbers in Linkup component files..."
rg -g '*.{json,mjs}' '"version":\s*"|version:\s*"' components/linkup/

Length of output: 369

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)

11-15: Consider implementing async options for query input.

According to the PR guidelines, it's recommended to accept user input through async options where possible. This could improve the user experience by providing dynamic suggestions or validation.

   query: {
     type: "string",
     label: "Query",
     description: "The search query for Linkup.",
+    async options({ prevContext }) {
+      // Implement query suggestions or validation here
+      return [];
+    },
   },
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure


16-24: Add a default value for the depth parameter.

Following the PR guidelines for optional props, consider setting a default value for the depth parameter to improve user experience.

   depth: {
     type: "string",
     label: "Search Depth",
     description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.",
     options: [
       "standard",
       "deep",
     ],
+    optional: true,
+    default: "standard",
   },
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d6313a7 and ef7fc84.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components

Comment on lines 3 to 8
export default {
name: "Linkup Search",
description: "Search and retrieve insights using the Linkup API. [See the documentation](https://docs.linkup.so/pages/api-reference/endpoint/post-search)",
key: "linkup-search",
version: "0.1.1",
type: "action",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix component structure to match naming guidelines.

The component structure violates the folder structure guidelines. There's a mismatch between:

  • File path: components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs
  • Component key: linkup-search

To fix this:

  1. Rename the directory from sourced to search
  2. Rename the file from sourced.mjs to search.mjs
    OR
  3. Update the component key from linkup-search to linkup-sourced
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

Comment on lines 61 to 77
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.search({
query: this.query,
depth: this.depth,
outputType: this.outputType,
structuredOutputSchema:
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema),
includeImages: this.includeImages,
});
$.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
return response;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
}
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve run method implementation and documentation.

The run method needs several improvements:

  1. References to undefined props (includeImages)
  2. Generic success message
  3. Missing JSDoc documentation
+  /**
+   * Executes the Linkup search
+   * @param {Object} $  - Context object
+   * @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results
+   */
   async run({ $ }) {
     try {
       const response = await this.app.search({
         query: this.query,
         depth: this.depth,
         outputType: this.outputType,
         structuredOutputSchema:
           this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema),
-        includeImages: this.includeImages,
       });
-      $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
+      $.export("$summary", `Successfully completed search for "${this.query}"`);
       return response;
     } catch (error) {
       console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
-      throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
+      throw new Error(
+        `Failed to search Linkup API: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.`
+      );
     }
   },
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.search({
query: this.query,
depth: this.depth,
outputType: this.outputType,
structuredOutputSchema:
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema),
includeImages: this.includeImages,
});
$.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
return response;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
}
},
/**
* Executes the Linkup search
* @param {Object} $ - Context object
* @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results
*/
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.search({
query: this.query,
depth: this.depth,
outputType: this.outputType,
structuredOutputSchema:
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema),
});
$.export("$summary", `Successfully completed search for "${this.query}"`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
throw new Error(
`Failed to search Linkup API: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.`
);
}
},
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

Comment on lines 26 to 60
additionalProps(props) {
if (this.outputType === "structured") {
props.structuredOutputSchema.optional = false;
props.structuredOutputSchema.hidden = false;
props.structuredOutputSchema.default = `{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"results": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string"
},
"year": {
"type": "number"
}
},
"required": [
"name",
"year"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}
}
},
"required": [
"results"
],
"additionalProperties": false
}`;
}
return {};
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix undefined props and add JSDoc documentation.

Several issues need attention:

  1. outputType and structuredOutputSchema are referenced but not defined in props
  2. Missing JSDoc documentation as required by PR guidelines
  3. Schema definition as string makes maintenance difficult
+  /**
+   * Adds additional properties based on output type
+   * @param {Object} props - Current properties
+   * @returns {Object} Additional properties
+   */
   additionalProps(props) {
+    const schema = {
+      type: "object",
+      properties: {
+        results: {
+          type: "array",
+          items: {
+            type: "object",
+            properties: {
+              name: { type: "string" },
+              year: { type: "number" }
+            },
+            required: ["name", "year"],
+            additionalProperties: false
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      required: ["results"],
+      additionalProperties: false
+    };
+
     if (this.outputType === "structured") {
       props.structuredOutputSchema.optional = false;
       props.structuredOutputSchema.hidden = false;
-      props.structuredOutputSchema.default = `{...}`;
+      props.structuredOutputSchema.default = JSON.stringify(schema, null, 2);
     }
     return {};
   },

Also, add the missing props:

   props: {
     app,
     query: {...},
     depth: {...},
+    outputType: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Output Type",
+      description: "Type of output to return",
+      options: ["structured"],
+      optional: true,
+    },
+    structuredOutputSchema: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Output Schema",
+      description: "JSON schema for structured output",
+      optional: true,
+    },
   },

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks

[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)

7-7: Consider semantic versioning for version updates.

Since this is a new component, consider starting with version "0.0.1" and following semantic versioning principles for future updates:

  • Major version (x.0.0) for breaking changes
  • Minor version (0.x.0) for new features
  • Patch version (0.0.x) for bug fixes

11-24: Enhance props with validation and defaults.

The props definition needs improvements:

  1. Add input validation for the query prop (e.g., minimum length)
  2. Set a default value for the depth prop
  3. Make depth prop optional since it has predefined options

Apply this diff:

     query: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Query",
       description: "The search query for Linkup.",
+      minLength: 1,
     },
     depth: {
       type: "string",
       label: "Search Depth",
       description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.",
+      optional: true,
+      default: "standard",
       options: [
         "standard",
         "deep",
       ],
     },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef7fc84 and 085ef70.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)

26-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve run method implementation.

The run method needs several improvements:

  1. The hardcoded outputType: "sourcedAnswer" should be a prop to allow flexibility
  2. The success message should include the query for better context
  3. Error handling should be more specific

Apply this diff:

+  /**
+   * Executes the Linkup sourced search
+   * @param {Object} $ - Context object
+   * @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results with natural language answer
+   */
   async run({ $ }) {
     try {
       const response = await this.app.search({
         query: this.query,
         depth: this.depth,
-        outputType: "sourcedAnswer",
+        outputType: this.outputType ?? "sourcedAnswer",
       });
-      $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
+      $.export("$summary", `Successfully completed sourced search for "${this.query}"`);
       return response;
     } catch (error) {
       console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
-      throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
+      throw new Error(
+        `Failed to execute sourced search: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.`
+      );
     }
   },

Also, add the outputType prop:

   props: {
     app,
     query: {...},
     depth: {...},
+    outputType: {
+      type: "string",
+      label: "Output Type",
+      description: "Type of output to return",
+      optional: true,
+    },
   },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


1-1: Verify app.search method compatibility.

Ensure that the search method in the app module supports:

  1. The "sourcedAnswer" output type
  2. The depth parameter options ("standard" and "deep")

Also applies to: 28-32

✅ Verification successful

The app.search method implementation is compatible with the requirements

The implementation properly supports:

  • The "sourcedAnswer" output type (verified in multiple actions)
  • Parameter pass-through to the API client, including depth options
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify app.search method implementation

# Check app module for search method implementation
echo "Checking app module for search method..."
rg -A 10 "search.*\(" components/linkup/linkup.app.mjs

# Check for sourcedAnswer output type handling
echo "Checking sourcedAnswer output type handling..."
rg -A 5 "sourcedAnswer" components/linkup

Length of output: 1379


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for depth parameter usage
echo "Checking depth parameter usage..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 "depth.*[\"'](?:standard|deep)[\"']" components/linkup

# Check for any depth parameter validation
echo "Checking depth parameter validation..."
rg -A 5 "depth.*=" components/linkup

Length of output: 276


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for search parameters in action files
echo "Checking search parameters in actions..."
rg -B 3 -A 3 "await app.search\(" components/linkup

# Check for any API or parameter documentation
echo "Checking for API documentation..."
fd README.md components/linkup -x cat {}

Length of output: 1856

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
User submitted Submitted by a user
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants