-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
add linkup actions #15381
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add linkup actions #15381
Conversation
@juliette0704 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new "Linkup Answer" action module in the Linkup component, allowing users to obtain natural language answers based on search queries. The changes include creating a new action module with metadata, defining parameters for query and search depth, and implementing an asynchronous Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified. |
Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs (3)
9-25
: Reduce code duplication by sharing props with search action.The props configuration is identical to the search action. Consider extracting these common props to a shared configuration file to maintain DRY principles.
Create a new file
components/linkup/common/props.mjs
:export const searchProps = { query: { type: "string", label: "Query", description: "The search query for Linkup.", }, depth: { type: "string", label: "Search Depth", description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.", options: ["standard", "deep"], }, };Then import and use in both actions:
+import { searchProps } from "../../common/props.mjs"; export default { // ... props: { app, - query: { - type: "string", - // ... - }, - depth: { - type: "string", - // ... - }, + ...searchProps, },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
26-39
: Improve error handling and add response validation.The error handling could be improved by:
- Adding specific error types/codes
- Validating the response format
- Using a more descriptive success message
async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.app.search({ query: this.query, depth: this.depth, outputType: "sourcedAnswer", }); + if (!response || !response.answer) { + throw new Error("Invalid response format: missing answer"); + } - $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully generated answer for query: "${this.query}"`); return response; } catch (error) { + const errorMessage = error.response?.data?.message || error.message; console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error); - throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error(`Failed to generate answer: ${errorMessage}`); } },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
28-32
: Consider using the dedicated answer method.Since we added an
answer
method in the app file, we should use it here instead of callingsearch
directly withoutputType: "sourcedAnswer"
.- const response = await this.app.search({ + const response = await this.app.answer({ query: this.query, depth: this.depth, - outputType: "sourcedAnswer", });This change would justify keeping the
answer
method in the app file. Otherwise, consider my earlier suggestion to remove it.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs
(1 hunks)components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs
(2 hunks)components/linkup/linkup.app.mjs
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (1)
5-5
: Document the removal of output configuration options.The simplified interface with hardcoded
outputType: "searchResults"
improves usability. However, please document the rationale for removing the output configuration options (outputType
,structuredOutputSchema
,includeImages
) in the PR description to help users understand the changes.Also applies to: 31-31
components/linkup/linkup.app.mjs
Outdated
answer(params) { | ||
const client = this._getClient(); | ||
return client.search(params); | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing redundant method or adding answer-specific logic.
The answer
method is currently just a wrapper around the search
method without any additional functionality. Either:
- Remove this method and use the existing
search
method directly, or - Add answer-specific logic/transformation to justify its existence.
export default { | ||
name: "Linkup Answer", | ||
description: "Get a natural language answer to your natural language question.", | ||
key: "linkup-search", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix component key to match folder name and resolve pipeline failure.
The component key "linkup-search"
conflicts with:
- Component folder name:
answer
- Component name:
"Linkup Answer"
This is causing the pipeline failure. According to the docs, these should all match.
Change the key to "linkup-answer"
to resolve the pipeline failure:
- key: "linkup-search",
+ key: "linkup-answer",
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
key: "linkup-search", | |
key: "linkup-answer", |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (2)
31-31
: Document the hardcoded outputType value.Since
outputType
is now hardcoded to "searchResults", please add a code comment explaining:
- What output format users should expect
- Why this specific type was chosen as the default
- What other types might be supported in the future
+ // "searchResults" returns a list of relevant objects in the standard format outputType: "searchResults",
Line range hint
1-39
: Enhance component to meet Pipedream guidelines.Please consider the following improvements to align with the component development guidelines:
- Add JSDoc documentation for the
run
method- Consider making
depth
an optional prop with a default value of "standard"- Implement async options for the
query
prop to improve user experienceHere's how you could implement these changes:
props: { app, query: { type: "string", label: "Query", description: "The search query for Linkup.", + async options({ prevContext }) { + // Implement typeahead suggestions based on previous searches + return this.app.getSuggestedQueries(prevContext); + }, }, depth: { type: "string", label: "Search Depth", description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.", + optional: true, + default: "standard", options: [ "standard", "deep", ], }, }, + /** + * Performs a natural language search using the Linkup API + * @param {Object} $ - The event object + * @returns {Promise<Object>} The search results + * @throws {Error} When the API request fails + */ async run({ $ }) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs
(2 hunks)components/linkup/package.json
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/linkup/package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/linkup/actions/search/search.mjs (1)
5-5
: Great improvement to the description!The new description is more user-friendly and clearly explains the action's purpose without relying on external documentation references.
key: "linkup-search", | ||
version: "0.0.1", | ||
version: "0.1.1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Version mismatch detected in answer action component
The version numbers are inconsistent across the Linkup component files:
components/linkup/actions/answer/answer.mjs
is at version "0.0.1"- While package.json and search.mjs are at version "0.1.1"
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version consistency across files.
The version was updated from "0.0.1" to "0.1.1", skipping "0.1.0". Let's ensure version numbers are consistent across all related files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version numbers in component files
echo "Checking version numbers in Linkup component files..."
rg -g '*.{json,mjs}' '"version":\s*"|version:\s*"' components/linkup/
Length of output: 369
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)
11-15
: Consider implementing async options for query input.According to the PR guidelines, it's recommended to accept user input through async options where possible. This could improve the user experience by providing dynamic suggestions or validation.
query: { type: "string", label: "Query", description: "The search query for Linkup.", + async options({ prevContext }) { + // Implement query suggestions or validation here + return []; + }, },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
16-24
: Add a default value for the depth parameter.Following the PR guidelines for optional props, consider setting a default value for the depth parameter to improve user experience.
depth: { type: "string", label: "Search Depth", description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.", options: [ "standard", "deep", ], + optional: true, + default: "standard", },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
export default { | ||
name: "Linkup Search", | ||
description: "Search and retrieve insights using the Linkup API. [See the documentation](https://docs.linkup.so/pages/api-reference/endpoint/post-search)", | ||
key: "linkup-search", | ||
version: "0.1.1", | ||
type: "action", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix component structure to match naming guidelines.
The component structure violates the folder structure guidelines. There's a mismatch between:
- File path:
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs
- Component key:
linkup-search
To fix this:
- Rename the directory from
sourced
tosearch
- Rename the file from
sourced.mjs
tosearch.mjs
OR - Update the component key from
linkup-search
tolinkup-sourced
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
async run({ $ }) { | ||
try { | ||
const response = await this.app.search({ | ||
query: this.query, | ||
depth: this.depth, | ||
outputType: this.outputType, | ||
structuredOutputSchema: | ||
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema), | ||
includeImages: this.includeImages, | ||
}); | ||
$.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query"); | ||
return response; | ||
} catch (error) { | ||
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error); | ||
throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`); | ||
} | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve run method implementation and documentation.
The run method needs several improvements:
- References to undefined props (
includeImages
) - Generic success message
- Missing JSDoc documentation
+ /**
+ * Executes the Linkup search
+ * @param {Object} $ - Context object
+ * @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results
+ */
async run({ $ }) {
try {
const response = await this.app.search({
query: this.query,
depth: this.depth,
outputType: this.outputType,
structuredOutputSchema:
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema),
- includeImages: this.includeImages,
});
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query");
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully completed search for "${this.query}"`);
return response;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error);
- throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`);
+ throw new Error(
+ `Failed to search Linkup API: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.`
+ );
}
},
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
async run({ $ }) { | |
try { | |
const response = await this.app.search({ | |
query: this.query, | |
depth: this.depth, | |
outputType: this.outputType, | |
structuredOutputSchema: | |
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema), | |
includeImages: this.includeImages, | |
}); | |
$.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query"); | |
return response; | |
} catch (error) { | |
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error); | |
throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`); | |
} | |
}, | |
/** | |
* Executes the Linkup search | |
* @param {Object} $ - Context object | |
* @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results | |
*/ | |
async run({ $ }) { | |
try { | |
const response = await this.app.search({ | |
query: this.query, | |
depth: this.depth, | |
outputType: this.outputType, | |
structuredOutputSchema: | |
this.structuredOutputSchema && JSON.parse(this.structuredOutputSchema), | |
}); | |
$.export("$summary", `Successfully completed search for "${this.query}"`); | |
return response; | |
} catch (error) { | |
console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error); | |
throw new Error( | |
`Failed to search Linkup API: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.` | |
); | |
} | |
}, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
additionalProps(props) { | ||
if (this.outputType === "structured") { | ||
props.structuredOutputSchema.optional = false; | ||
props.structuredOutputSchema.hidden = false; | ||
props.structuredOutputSchema.default = `{ | ||
"type": "object", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"results": { | ||
"type": "array", | ||
"items": { | ||
"type": "object", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"name": { | ||
"type": "string" | ||
}, | ||
"year": { | ||
"type": "number" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"required": [ | ||
"name", | ||
"year" | ||
], | ||
"additionalProperties": false | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"required": [ | ||
"results" | ||
], | ||
"additionalProperties": false | ||
}`; | ||
} | ||
return {}; | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix undefined props and add JSDoc documentation.
Several issues need attention:
outputType
andstructuredOutputSchema
are referenced but not defined in props- Missing JSDoc documentation as required by PR guidelines
- Schema definition as string makes maintenance difficult
+ /**
+ * Adds additional properties based on output type
+ * @param {Object} props - Current properties
+ * @returns {Object} Additional properties
+ */
additionalProps(props) {
+ const schema = {
+ type: "object",
+ properties: {
+ results: {
+ type: "array",
+ items: {
+ type: "object",
+ properties: {
+ name: { type: "string" },
+ year: { type: "number" }
+ },
+ required: ["name", "year"],
+ additionalProperties: false
+ }
+ }
+ },
+ required: ["results"],
+ additionalProperties: false
+ };
+
if (this.outputType === "structured") {
props.structuredOutputSchema.optional = false;
props.structuredOutputSchema.hidden = false;
- props.structuredOutputSchema.default = `{...}`;
+ props.structuredOutputSchema.default = JSON.stringify(schema, null, 2);
}
return {};
},
Also, add the missing props:
props: {
app,
query: {...},
depth: {...},
+ outputType: {
+ type: "string",
+ label: "Output Type",
+ description: "Type of output to return",
+ options: ["structured"],
+ optional: true,
+ },
+ structuredOutputSchema: {
+ type: "string",
+ label: "Output Schema",
+ description: "JSON schema for structured output",
+ optional: true,
+ },
},
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull Request Checks
[error] Component folder name, component file name without extension and component key without slug should be the same. See the docs: https://pipedream.com/docs/components/guidelines/#folder-structure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)
7-7
: Consider semantic versioning for version updates.Since this is a new component, consider starting with version "0.0.1" and following semantic versioning principles for future updates:
- Major version (x.0.0) for breaking changes
- Minor version (0.x.0) for new features
- Patch version (0.0.x) for bug fixes
11-24
: Enhance props with validation and defaults.The props definition needs improvements:
- Add input validation for the query prop (e.g., minimum length)
- Set a default value for the depth prop
- Make depth prop optional since it has predefined options
Apply this diff:
query: { type: "string", label: "Query", description: "The search query for Linkup.", + minLength: 1, }, depth: { type: "string", label: "Search Depth", description: "Defines the precision of the search. `standard` returns results quickly; `deep` takes longer but yields more complete results.", + optional: true, + default: "standard", options: [ "standard", "deep", ], },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/linkup/actions/sourced/sourced.mjs (2)
26-39
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove run method implementation.
The run method needs several improvements:
- The hardcoded
outputType: "sourcedAnswer"
should be a prop to allow flexibility- The success message should include the query for better context
- Error handling should be more specific
Apply this diff:
+ /** + * Executes the Linkup sourced search + * @param {Object} $ - Context object + * @returns {Promise<Object>} Search results with natural language answer + */ async run({ $ }) { try { const response = await this.app.search({ query: this.query, depth: this.depth, - outputType: "sourcedAnswer", + outputType: this.outputType ?? "sourcedAnswer", }); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully completed search query"); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully completed sourced search for "${this.query}"`); return response; } catch (error) { console.error("Error calling Linkup API:", error); - throw new Error(`Failed to fetch data from Linkup API: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error( + `Failed to execute sourced search: ${error.message}. Please verify your query and try again.` + ); } },Also, add the outputType prop:
props: { app, query: {...}, depth: {...}, + outputType: { + type: "string", + label: "Output Type", + description: "Type of output to return", + optional: true, + }, },Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1-1
: Verify app.search method compatibility.Ensure that the
search
method in the app module supports:
- The "sourcedAnswer" output type
- The depth parameter options ("standard" and "deep")
Also applies to: 28-32
✅ Verification successful
The app.search method implementation is compatible with the requirements
The implementation properly supports:
- The "sourcedAnswer" output type (verified in multiple actions)
- Parameter pass-through to the API client, including depth options
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify app.search method implementation # Check app module for search method implementation echo "Checking app module for search method..." rg -A 10 "search.*\(" components/linkup/linkup.app.mjs # Check for sourcedAnswer output type handling echo "Checking sourcedAnswer output type handling..." rg -A 5 "sourcedAnswer" components/linkupLength of output: 1379
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for depth parameter usage echo "Checking depth parameter usage..." rg -B 2 -A 2 "depth.*[\"'](?:standard|deep)[\"']" components/linkup # Check for any depth parameter validation echo "Checking depth parameter validation..." rg -A 5 "depth.*=" components/linkupLength of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for search parameters in action files echo "Checking search parameters in actions..." rg -B 3 -A 3 "await app.search\(" components/linkup # Check for any API or parameter documentation echo "Checking for API documentation..." fd README.md components/linkup -x cat {}Length of output: 1856
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores