New Components - bitbadges #15405
New Components - bitbadges #15405
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@trevormil is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@trevormil has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughA new feature for completing BitBadges claims has been introduced across two new action files. The implementation allows users to complete claims by sending POST requests to the BitBadges API. The actions support various input parameters like Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you so much for submitting this! We've added it to our backlog to review, and our team has been notified. |
|
Thanks for submitting this PR! When we review PRs, we follow the Pipedream component guidelines. If you're not familiar, here's a quick checklist:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs (1)
12-16: Consider using structured input instead of hyphen-separated string.The
claimInfoproperty combines multiple values into a hyphen-separated string, which is prone to errors and harder to validate. Consider using separate properties for better type safety and validation.- claimInfo: { - type: "string", - label: "Claim Info", - description: "Claim details passed as a string in the format \"claimId-passwordPluginId-password\"", - }, + claimId: { + type: "string", + label: "Claim ID", + description: "The unique identifier of the claim", + }, + passwordPluginId: { + type: "string", + label: "Password Plugin ID", + description: "The identifier of the password plugin", + }, + password: { + type: "string", + label: "Password", + description: "The password for the claim", + secret: true, + },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs(1 hunks)components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs (1)
17-21: Add address format validation.The
addressproperty should include format validation to ensure valid BitBadges addresses are provided.Could you provide the expected format for BitBadges addresses? This would help in implementing proper validation.
| const result = response; | ||
|
|
||
| // Note: This means a successful trigger (add to queue), not a claim completion | ||
| // You can use the claimAttemptId to poll | ||
| return { | ||
| success: true, | ||
| claimAttemptId: result.claimAttemptId || "", | ||
| currentTimestamp: Date.now(), | ||
| }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Failed to complete claim: ${error.message}`); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance response handling and error management.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- No validation of the response structure
- Error messages might expose sensitive information
- No retry mechanism for transient failures
- const result = response;
+ // Validate response structure
+ if (!response?.claimAttemptId) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid response: missing claimAttemptId");
+ }
+
+ const result = {
+ success: true,
+ claimAttemptId: response.claimAttemptId,
+ currentTimestamp: Date.now(),
+ };
+
+ $.export("result", result);
+ return result;
} catch (error) {
- throw new Error(`Failed to complete claim: ${error.message}`);
+ // Sanitize error message
+ const safeMessage = "Failed to complete claim. Please try again later.";
+ $.export("error", {
+ message: safeMessage,
+ code: error.response?.status,
+ timestamp: Date.now(),
+ });
+ throw new Error(safeMessage);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const result = response; | |
| // Note: This means a successful trigger (add to queue), not a claim completion | |
| // You can use the claimAttemptId to poll | |
| return { | |
| success: true, | |
| claimAttemptId: result.claimAttemptId || "", | |
| currentTimestamp: Date.now(), | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error(`Failed to complete claim: ${error.message}`); | |
| } | |
| // Validate response structure | |
| if (!response?.claimAttemptId) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid response: missing claimAttemptId"); | |
| } | |
| const result = { | |
| success: true, | |
| claimAttemptId: response.claimAttemptId, | |
| currentTimestamp: Date.now(), | |
| }; | |
| return result; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| // Sanitize error message | |
| const safeMessage = "Failed to complete claim. Please try again later."; | |
| throw new Error(safeMessage); | |
| } |
| try { | ||
| await axios($, { | ||
| method: "POST", | ||
| url: `https://api.bitbadges.io/api/v0/bin-actions/add/${this.dynamicDataId}/${this.dataSecret}`, | ||
| headers: { | ||
| "Content-Type": "application/json", | ||
| "Accept": "application/json", | ||
| "x-api-key": this.bitbadges.$auth.api_key, | ||
| }, | ||
| data: { | ||
| address: this.address, | ||
| id: this.id, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| username: this.username, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve request construction and payload handling.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement in how the request is constructed and how data is sent.
+ // Filter out undefined values from payload
+ const data = Object.entries({
+ address: this.address,
+ id: this.id,
+ email: this.email,
+ username: this.username,
+ }).reduce((acc, [key, value]) => {
+ if (value !== undefined) {
+ acc[key] = value;
+ }
+ return acc;
+ }, {});
+
+ const endpoint = new URL(
+ `bin-actions/add/${encodeURIComponent(this.dynamicDataId)}/${encodeURIComponent(this.dataSecret)}`,
+ "https://api.bitbadges.io/api/v0/"
+ ).toString();
+
await axios($, {
method: "POST",
- url: `https://api.bitbadges.io/api/v0/bin-actions/add/${this.dynamicDataId}/${this.dataSecret}`,
+ url: endpoint,
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Accept": "application/json",
"x-api-key": this.bitbadges.$auth.api_key,
+ "Content-Length": Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(data)).length.toString(),
},
- data: {
- address: this.address,
- id: this.id,
- email: this.email,
- username: this.username,
- },
+ data,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs (1)
71-80: Optimize response handling and avoid data duplication.The current implementation:
- Creates and exports the same data structure twice
- Lacks response validation
- // Validate successful response - const result = { - success: true, - timestamp: Date.now(), - }; - $.export("result", result); - return { - success: true, - timestamp: Date.now(), - }; + const result = { + success: true, + timestamp: Date.now(), + dynamicDataId: this.dynamicDataId, + addedFields: Object.keys(data), + }; + $.export("result", result); + return result;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs(1 hunks)components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs
[error] 37-37: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 40-40: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'claimId'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'claimId' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 45-45: Shouldn't redeclare 'passwordPluginId'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'passwordPluginId' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 46-46: Shouldn't redeclare 'password'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'password' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs (1)
74-82: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance response validation and success criteria.
The current implementation:
- Lacks response structure validation
- Uses an empty string fallback for
claimAttemptId- Doesn't clearly distinguish between queue addition and claim completion
- const result = response; + // Validate response structure + if (!response?.claimAttemptId) { + throw new Error("Invalid response: missing claimAttemptId"); + } + + const result = { + success: true, + status: "queued", // Indicate that this is a queue addition + claimAttemptId: response.claimAttemptId, + currentTimestamp: Date.now(), + }; + + $.export("result", result); return { success: true, - claimAttemptId: result.claimAttemptId || "", + status: "queued", + claimAttemptId: result.claimAttemptId, currentTimestamp: Date.now(), };Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| const claimId = details[0]; | ||
| const passwordPluginId = details[1]; | ||
| const password = details[2]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant variable declarations.
These variables are already declared through destructuring in line 36. Remove these redundant declarations to fix the "no redeclare" errors.
- const claimId = details[0];
- const passwordPluginId = details[1];
- const password = details[2];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const claimId = details[0]; | |
| const passwordPluginId = details[1]; | |
| const password = details[2]; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 44-44: Shouldn't redeclare 'claimId'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'claimId' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 45-45: Shouldn't redeclare 'passwordPluginId'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'passwordPluginId' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 46-46: Shouldn't redeclare 'password'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'password' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs (2)
53-65: Optimize validation logic.The current validation works but can be simplified using Object.values().some().
- const storeFields = { - address: this.address, - id: this.id, - email: this.email, - username: this.username, - }; - - if (!Object.values(storeFields).some((value) => value !== undefined)) { + if (!Object.values({ + address: this.address, + id: this.id, + email: this.email, + username: this.username, + }).some(Boolean)) {
94-114: Consider adding error logging.While the error handling is good, adding logging would help with debugging.
} catch (error) { // Sanitize and structure error information const errorInfo = { message: "Failed to add to dynamic store. Please try again later.", code: error.response?.status, timestamp: Date.now(), }; + // Log error details for debugging + console.error("BitBadges API Error:", { + status: error.response?.status, + data: error.response?.data, + timestamp: Date.now(), + }); $.export("error", errorInfo); throw new Error(errorInfo.message); }components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs (1)
56-76: Enhance claim info validation.While the current validation is good, it could be more robust.
const details = this.claimInfo.split("-"); - if (details.length !== 3 || !details.every((part) => part.trim())) { + if (!this.claimInfo || details.length !== 3 || !details.every((part) => part.trim())) { throw new Error( "Invalid claim details: each part must be non-empty", ); } // Sanitize and validate each part const [ claimId, passwordPluginId, password, ] = details.map((part) => part.trim()); + + // Enforce maximum length constraints + const MAX_LENGTH = 100; + if ([claimId, passwordPluginId, password].some(part => part.length > MAX_LENGTH)) { + throw new Error("One or more parts exceed maximum length"); + } + if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(claimId)) { throw new Error("Invalid claim ID format"); } if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(passwordPluginId)) { throw new Error("Invalid password plugin ID format"); } + // Ensure password meets minimum requirements + if (password.length < 8) { + throw new Error("Password must be at least 8 characters long"); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs(1 hunks)components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/bitbadges/actions/add-to-dynamic-store.mjs (1)
79-93: Well-implemented request construction!Good use of:
- URL constructor for safe parameter encoding
- Proper headers setup
- API key authentication
components/bitbadges/actions/complete-claim.mjs (1)
94-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error handling and reporting.
The current error handling could be more informative while maintaining security.
try { const response = await axios($, { method: "post", url: endpoint, headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json", "Accept": "application/json", "x-api-key": `${this.bitbadges.$auth.api_key}`, }, data, }); // Validate response structure if (!response?.claimAttemptId) { throw new Error("Invalid response: missing claimAttemptId"); } const result = { success: true, claimAttemptId: response.claimAttemptId, currentTimestamp: Date.now(), }; + $.export("result", result); return result; } catch (error) { - // Sanitize error message - const safeMessage = "Failed to complete claim. Please try again later."; - throw new Error(safeMessage); + // Structure and sanitize error information + const errorInfo = { + message: "Failed to complete claim. Please try again later.", + code: error.response?.status || 500, + timestamp: Date.now(), + }; + + // Log detailed error for debugging + console.error("BitBadges Claim Error:", { + status: error.response?.status, + data: error.response?.data, + timestamp: Date.now(), + }); + + $.export("error", errorInfo); + throw new Error(errorInfo.message); }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| props: { | ||
| app, | ||
| dynamicDataId: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Dynamic Data ID", | ||
| description: "The dynamic data store ID to add to.", | ||
| optional: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| dataSecret: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Data Secret", | ||
| description: "The data secret of the dynamic data store.", | ||
| optional: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| address: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Address", | ||
| description: | ||
| "The address to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an address store.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| id: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "ID", | ||
| description: | ||
| "The ID to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| email: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Email", | ||
| description: | ||
| "The email to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an email store.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| username: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Username", | ||
| description: | ||
| "The username to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add comprehensive input validation for props.
While the props are well-defined, additional validation would improve data integrity:
- Email format validation
- Address format validation (for blockchain addresses)
- ID format validation
Add a validateProps method to validate inputs:
props: {
// ... existing props ...
+ validateProps() {
+ // Validate email format if provided
+ if (this.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(this.email)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid email format");
+ }
+
+ // Validate blockchain address format if provided
+ if (this.address && !/^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$/.test(this.address)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid blockchain address format");
+ }
+
+ // Validate ID format if provided
+ if (this.id && !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(this.id)) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid ID format");
+ }
+
+ return true;
+ },
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| props: { | |
| app, | |
| dynamicDataId: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Dynamic Data ID", | |
| description: "The dynamic data store ID to add to.", | |
| optional: false, | |
| }, | |
| dataSecret: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Data Secret", | |
| description: "The data secret of the dynamic data store.", | |
| optional: false, | |
| }, | |
| address: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Address", | |
| description: | |
| "The address to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an address store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| id: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "ID", | |
| description: | |
| "The ID to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| email: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Email", | |
| description: | |
| "The email to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an email store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| username: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Username", | |
| description: | |
| "The username to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| props: { | |
| app, | |
| dynamicDataId: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Dynamic Data ID", | |
| description: "The dynamic data store ID to add to.", | |
| optional: false, | |
| }, | |
| dataSecret: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Data Secret", | |
| description: "The data secret of the dynamic data store.", | |
| optional: false, | |
| }, | |
| address: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Address", | |
| description: | |
| "The address to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an address store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| id: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "ID", | |
| description: | |
| "The ID to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| email: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Email", | |
| description: | |
| "The email to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is an email store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| username: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Username", | |
| description: | |
| "The username to add to the dynamic data store. Only applicable if it is a socials store.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| validateProps() { | |
| // Validate email format if provided | |
| if (this.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(this.email)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid email format"); | |
| } | |
| // Validate blockchain address format if provided | |
| if (this.address && !/^0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$/.test(this.address)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid blockchain address format"); | |
| } | |
| // Validate ID format if provided | |
| if (this.id && !/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$/.test(this.id)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid ID format"); | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| }, | |
| }, |
| validateProps() { | ||
| const storeFields = { | ||
| address: this.address, | ||
| id: this.id, | ||
| email: this.email, | ||
| username: this.username, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const providedFields = Object.entries(storeFields) | ||
| .filter(([ | ||
| , | ||
| value, | ||
| ]) => value !== undefined); | ||
|
|
||
| if (providedFields.length === 0) { | ||
| throw new Error("At least one store-specific field (address, id, email, or username) must be provided"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Add email format validation | ||
| if (this.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(this.email)) { | ||
| throw new Error("Invalid email format"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove invalid validateProps method.
The validateProps method references props (id, email, username) that are not defined in this component. This appears to be incorrectly copied from add-to-dynamic-store.mjs.
Remove the entire validateProps method as it's not applicable to this component's props.
- validateProps() {
- const storeFields = {
- address: this.address,
- id: this.id,
- email: this.email,
- username: this.username,
- };
-
- const providedFields = Object.entries(storeFields)
- .filter(([
- ,
- value,
- ]) => value !== undefined);
-
- if (providedFields.length === 0) {
- throw new Error("At least one store-specific field (address, id, email, or username) must be provided");
- }
-
- // Add email format validation
- if (this.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(this.email)) {
- throw new Error("Invalid email format");
- }
-
- return true;
- },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| validateProps() { | |
| const storeFields = { | |
| address: this.address, | |
| id: this.id, | |
| email: this.email, | |
| username: this.username, | |
| }; | |
| const providedFields = Object.entries(storeFields) | |
| .filter(([ | |
| , | |
| value, | |
| ]) => value !== undefined); | |
| if (providedFields.length === 0) { | |
| throw new Error("At least one store-specific field (address, id, email, or username) must be provided"); | |
| } | |
| // Add email format validation | |
| if (this.email && !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(this.email)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid email format"); | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| }, |
trevormil
changed the title
WHY
Add common BitBadges actions (complete claim, add to store) to the already implemented BitBadges integration on the site.
Summary by CodeRabbit