Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade socket.io from 2.4.1 to 2.5.0 #430

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sa-secrd
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • backend/package.json
  • backend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
  768  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)

…rabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
@backstage-rdstation
Copy link

Olá!

Obrigado por enviar o pull request para corrigir as vulnerabilidades nas dependências do projeto. No entanto, para melhorar a qualidade da descrição do pull request, sugiro adicionar mais informações.

Você poderia explicar de forma clara o motivo da correção das vulnerabilidades, incluindo o contexto histórico da mudança, a justificativa da correção ou o racional por trás dela. Além disso, seria útil incluir um passo a passo ou instruções de teste para facilitar a revisão e teste do pull request.

Essas melhorias ajudarão a tornar a descrição do pull request mais completa e informativa. Obrigado pelo seu trabalho e colaboração!

Esse comentário foi gerado por inteligência artificial

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants