-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
test: exclude failing aimes test cases #1407
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test: exclude failing aimes test cases #1407
Conversation
addresses: boostorg#1403 The Aimes test cases are a set of complex real life features which are not yet totally robust for geographic buffers.
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ endforeach() | |||
foreach(item IN ITEMS | |||
buffer_point_geo | |||
buffer_polygon_geo | |||
buffer_linestring |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one was fine without adaptions
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ endforeach() | |||
foreach(item IN ITEMS | |||
buffer_point_geo | |||
buffer_polygon_geo | |||
buffer_linestring | |||
buffer_linestring_geo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this case I had to exclude 5 cases.
I will investigate them later this year, after integrating some other enhancements (robust side, #1404, ...)
@@ -149,6 +173,8 @@ int test_main(int, char* []) | |||
test_linestring<bg::strategy::andoyer, true, bg::model::point<default_test_type, 2, bg::cs::geographic<bg::degree> > >(); | |||
test_linestring<bg::strategy::thomas, true, bg::model::point<default_test_type, 2, bg::cs::geographic<bg::degree> > >(); | |||
|
|||
test_linestring_aimes<bg::strategy::andoyer, true, bg::model::point<default_test_type, 2, bg::cs::geographic<bg::degree> > >(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not run for thomas
for speed and complexity reasons
// Cases where the algorithm is still failing. | ||
std::set<int> const skip_cases_round_round{17, 22, 38, 181, 196}; | ||
std::set<int> const skip_cases_round_flat{17, 22, 38, 103, 196}; | ||
std::set<int> const skip_cases_miter_flat{17, 18, 22, 38, 103, 196}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
196 was already skipped (in another way, see below).
Two other cases were already skipped but are now fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I am ok with merging, but should we leave the issue open for tracking?
addresses: #1403
The Aimes test cases are a set of complex real life features which are not yet totally robust for geographic buffers.