-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 249
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Support multiple attachments on Android #161
Conversation
Instant crash on first run what am i missing? EDIT: OK got it running. Please add the changes made in |
I've implemented the FileProvider the way https://github.com/react-native-community/react-native-share does it so it will work if the app has its own FileProvider implementation (otherwise the manifest merger will fail on build). |
Even better, good catch. The only thing im not quite sure about is Shouldn't this be up to the user instead of having it inside the lib? |
True, I only added it to mimic RNShare's implementation - I assume it would work without it? |
It does. If the user needs it however, its up to him to add the permission into the app's manifest. If you remove the permission from your commit, i think we're good to go. |
Should we use |
Does not make a big difference right now but looking into the future it might be a good decision to do that, yes. |
@Relax594 all done! |
Thank you! ping @chirag04 LGTM. |
awesome! appreciate your contributions 🙌 |
### Description We weren't able to attach logs on certain devices. I suspect [this PR](chirag04/react-native-mail#161) fixed the issue, though I need someone else to confirm since it works fine on my device fixes #5730
### Description We weren't able to attach logs on certain devices. I suspect [this PR](chirag04/react-native-mail#161) fixed the issue, though I need someone else to confirm since it works fine on my device fixes #5730
Fixes #153.
I've tested this in my app using my patch via
patch-package
but haven't tested it properly standalone.It uses
FileProvider
so might need to include some of #127.Please can someone else test it too to make sure there's nothing else missing in this implementation?