Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[fs.op.copy] Replace non-codeblocks with outputblocks #7146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2025

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja commented Jul 21, 2024

These blocks are used for showing of directory hierarchy but not code, so we should use outputblock.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Oct 17, 2024
These blocks are used for showing of directory hierarchy but not code,
so we should use `outputblock`.

Co-authored-by: Eelis van der Weegen <eelis@eelis.net>
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja changed the title Replace more non-codeblocks with outputblocks [fs.op.copy] Replace non-codeblocks with outputblocks Mar 29, 2025
@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tkoeppe I've rebased and reworded the commit/PR messages.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the needs rebase The pull request needs a git rebase to resolve merge conflicts. label Mar 29, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer merged commit 0749811 into cplusplus:main Mar 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 29, 2025

Thanks!

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the eelis/outputblocks branch March 30, 2025 23:36
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants