-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
feat: Add initial project structure for QA Test Automation, including… #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: Add initial project structure for QA Test Automation, including… #5
Conversation
… Cypress configuration, ESLint and Prettier setup, example environment variables, and foundational test files for DemoQA and AutomationExercise websites.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @gramajoguadalupe ! 👋
Thank you so much for this incredible submission! 🙌 It reflects not only strong technical skills but also a clear understanding of what quality, maintainable, and scalable test automation looks like.
At NaNLABS, our goal is that everyone walks away with something valuable to explore or reflect on, so even in cases like this—where the bar is already incredibly high—we’ll still leave a few optional suggestions for growth or experimentation. These are not requirements but opportunities if you’re curious to take it even further 🚀
🌟 Highlights
Here are some of the things we absolutely loved:
- ✅ Excellent architecture and folder structure — clean, modular, and easy to follow
- ✅ Comprehensive coverage — UI, API, performance, accessibility, responsive behavior, and more
- ✅ Professional CI/CD setup — complete GitHub Actions implementation with multi-browser matrix
- ✅ Advanced Cypress usage — custom commands, well-structured Page Objects, fluent interface
- ✅ Solid test data management — thoughtful fixtures and organization
- ✅ Great documentation — detailed and easy to follow
- ✅ Mindset focused on scalability and best practices — your solution is future-proof and production-grade
💡 Suggestions (Totally Optional)
We’re including these only as exploratory opportunities. Your solution already goes above and beyond:
- 🔍 Improve selector strategy by using
data-testid
attributes for more robust and future-proof tests. - 📊 Introduce data-driven testing to make your test suite even more flexible and scalable.
- 🧪 Expand coverage in DemoQA and explore additional flows like checkout and auth.
- ⚙️ Handle edge cases such as network failures, invalid data, or timeout scenarios.
- 🚦 Explore Lighthouse or visual regression tools for broader test coverage.
- 🔄 Add a Base Page class to reduce duplication and unify shared behaviors across Page Objects.
✅ Final Thoughts
This is an outstanding submission in every sense. The level of care, quality, and professionalism is evident throughout. If you continue evolving this project even further, it could serve as a reference repository for others learning test automation.
If you're interested in diving deeper into any of the areas we mentioned, we’re happy to share more ideas or resources.
Thanks again for the time, effort, and quality you’ve put into this challenge — truly impressive work 👏👏
failOnStatusCode: false | ||
}).then((response) => { | ||
// Verify response status | ||
expect(response.status).to.eq(200) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great response validation and error handling! Good use of failOnStatusCode
for robust testing
// Page methods | ||
visit() { | ||
cy.visit('/') | ||
return this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent method chaining and fluent interface! Good separation of concerns
run: npm run test:newman | ||
continue-on-error: true | ||
|
||
- name: 📊 Upload API test artifacts |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Professional pipeline with proper artifact management!
name: 🌐 E2E Testing | ||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
needs: setup | ||
strategy: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good use of matrix strategy for browser testing!
|
||
class HomePage { | ||
// Page elements | ||
get logo() { return cy.get('img[src*="logo"]') } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to use data-testid attributes for more stable selectors?
"focusManagement": true | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding more edge cases and boundary testing. Add data for negative testing scenarios
📋 Description
Added comprehensive GitHub Actions CI/CD configuration and test framework improvements.
🚀 Changes Made
cypress.config.js
with CI/CD specific settingspackage.json
with additional test scripts🧪 Testing
📈 Features Added