Skip to content

8350329: C2: Div looses dependency on condition that guarantees divisor not zero in counted loop after peeling #25262

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rwestrel
Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel commented May 16, 2025

This is an issue similar to 8349139: the type of the iv phi of a
counted loop is narrowed down so a Div node doesn't need a control
input. The loop is then peeled. The Div in the loop body is
guaranteed to be non zero only if it is actually executed so the Div
is implicitly dependent on the zero trip guard. Then the loop looses
its backedge and the Div freely floats. The Div instruction is
scheduled above the zero trip guard and faults. Had the Div been
control dependent on the zero trip guard, it wouldn't have
executed. The fix, similar to 8349139 is to add a CastII on peeling
to make the dependency between what's in the loop body and relies on
the narrowed down type of the iv phi and the zero trip guard explicit.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8350329: C2: Div looses dependency on condition that guarantees divisor not zero in counted loop after peeling (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25262/head:pull/25262
$ git checkout pull/25262

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25262
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25262/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25262

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25262

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25262.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@rwestrel rwestrel marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2025 08:28
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 16, 2025

👋 Welcome back roland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2025

@rwestrel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8350329: C2: Div looses dependency on condition that guarantees divisor not zero in counted loop after peeling

Reviewed-by: thartmann, chagedorn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 44 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 16, 2025

@rwestrel The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label May 16, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 16, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Comment on lines 28 to 29
* @run main/othervm -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:-BackgroundCompilation -XX:-UseLoopPredicate -XX:+StressGCM -XX:StressSeed=31780379 TestPeeledLoopNoBackedgeFloatingDiv
* @run main/othervm -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:-BackgroundCompilation -XX:-UseLoopPredicate -XX:+StressGCM TestPeeledLoopNoBackedgeFloatingDiv
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions for StressGCM and maybe also add -XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions when run without C2 since UseLoopPredicate is a C2 only flag.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for reviewing this. Done in the new commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me too.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 16, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants