Skip to content

[smart_holder] smart_holder / master benchmarking 2025-02-16 #5529

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: archive/smart_holder
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rwgk
Copy link
Collaborator

@rwgk rwgk commented Feb 17, 2025

Description

NOT FOR MERGING

This PR simply removes smart_holder tests so that

  • tests/CMakeLists.txt is identical to master

while the code under

  • include/pybind11 is exactly as under the current smart_holder branch.

This was used to collect the measurements shown in the

The results in a nutshell:

  • .so sizes of extension modules are expected to be <3% larger (smart_holder / master).
  • Compile and link times are expected to be <2% larger.
  • Run times are expected to be practically identical (based on pytest execution times).

Note that these are not micro benchmarks, but assumed to reflect real-life situations.

For easy future reference:

Suggested changelog entry:

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant