Skip to content

Field definitions are not limited to current schema #206

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Conversation

joschug
Copy link

@joschug joschug commented Oct 11, 2021

The current implementation doesn't work correctly if the argument has a fully-qualified type from another schema, e.g.

procedure p1(p_file sys.utl_file.file_type);

This PR corrects this issue by using the type_owner instead of the current schema when looking up the field definition.

@joschug
Copy link
Author

joschug commented Oct 11, 2021

This is related to issue #204.

@joschug joschug closed this Oct 27, 2021
@joschug
Copy link
Author

joschug commented Oct 27, 2021

Included in #208

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant