-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
chore: cleanup flake.nix #1486
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: cleanup flake.nix #1486
Conversation
@@ -4,12 +4,11 @@ | |||
inputs = { | |||
nixpkgs.url = "github:nixos/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-unstable"; | |||
flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils"; | |||
nix2container.url = "github:nlewo/nix2container"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unused dependency
flake.nix
Outdated
inherit | ||
wal-g | ||
sfcgal | ||
supabase-groonga | ||
postgresql_15 | ||
postgresql_orioledb-17; | ||
inherit (pkgs.cargo-pgrx) | ||
cargo-pgrx_0_11_3 | ||
cargo-pgrx_0_12_6 | ||
cargo-pgrx_0_12_9; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Preferring the inherit
statement is a good practice, also it avoids typos
flake.nix
Outdated
# TODO: None of these tests are used | ||
sqlTests = ./nix/tests/smoke; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if tests are failing or what, but this should be fixed somehow
Thanks this is a helpful review! |
Everything looks good. the smoke tests are redundant and the line and files should just be removed. |
848341f
to
c85efc2
Compare
Removed the smoke tests and rebased to fix merge conflicts |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Minor flake.nix cleanup. My editor auto removes whitespace so I would recommend enabling "hide all whitespace" option when reviewing this PR
More information on specific changes in PR comments