Skip to content

chore: cleanup flake.nix #1486

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gytis-ivaskevicius
Copy link

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Minor flake.nix cleanup. My editor auto removes whitespace so I would recommend enabling "hide all whitespace" option when reviewing this PR

More information on specific changes in PR comments

@gytis-ivaskevicius gytis-ivaskevicius requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 19:41
@@ -4,12 +4,11 @@
inputs = {
nixpkgs.url = "github:nixos/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-unstable";
flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils";
nix2container.url = "github:nlewo/nix2container";
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unused dependency

flake.nix Outdated
Comment on lines 400 to 411
inherit
wal-g
sfcgal
supabase-groonga
postgresql_15
postgresql_orioledb-17;
inherit (pkgs.cargo-pgrx)
cargo-pgrx_0_11_3
cargo-pgrx_0_12_6
cargo-pgrx_0_12_9;
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Preferring the inherit statement is a good practice, also it avoids typos

flake.nix Outdated
Comment on lines 604 to 605
# TODO: None of these tests are used
sqlTests = ./nix/tests/smoke;
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if tests are failing or what, but this should be fixed somehow

@samrose
Copy link
Collaborator

samrose commented Mar 21, 2025

Thanks this is a helpful review!

@samrose
Copy link
Collaborator

samrose commented Mar 21, 2025

Everything looks good. the smoke tests are redundant and the line and files should just be removed.

@gytis-ivaskevicius gytis-ivaskevicius requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 16:50
@gytis-ivaskevicius
Copy link
Author

Removed the smoke tests and rebased to fix merge conflicts

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants