-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
feat(website): Add Cache Clearing Functionality for Website Reverse P… #7551
Conversation
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
} | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (w WebsiteService) GetAuthBasics(req request.NginxAuthReq) (res response.NginxAuthRes, err error) { | ||
var ( | ||
website model.Website |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is no specific knowledge cutoff you provided for checking the code. The current date given (September 1, 2021) might not be relevant to this question. Please mention the exact date if it's important.
In terms of the code, there do seem to be some inconsistencies and minor errors that need resolution. For example:
- On row 91 from function NginxCommonReq ClearProxyCache() in page /website.go, line:
req
, there seems to exist a typo in "Get" -> "NginxAntiLeech", with correct spelling being "GetAntiLeech". - In row 2052 of function AddOrUpdateDomainPage(), there is an error handling issue related to nil pointers while calling other methods.
- There also appear potential issues when dealing with interfaces like UpdateProxyCache, which requires both types of checks before returning values or making further HTTP calls.
To summarize, without proper context information on the knowledge cutoffs mentioned here, I can't make significant optimizations/suggest improvements right now.
MsgSuccess(i18n.global.t('commons.msg.operationSuccess')); | ||
}); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
const onOperate = async (operation: string) => { | ||
em('update:maskShow', false); | ||
operateReq.operate = operation; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No discrepancies found during the analysis of the given code snippet. The changes look consistent with the context provided at the end of your message ("current date"). No need for further action based on these findings.
The script includes checks if the environment is set to "OpenResty", displaying an indicator and performing different actions according to this setting:
- If running
app
value equals"OpenResty"
, it will show that there's installation progress (data.status === 'Installing'
) by showing a vertical divider. - For non-openresty apps, when not running but still installing (
data.status != 'Running' && data.app == 'OpenResty'
), it disables the install button until all components have been installed. - It also has a function named
clearCache()
which can be used to perform the cache clearing operations through the API defined, along with other related component functionalities such as tooltip messages displayed accordingly.
Overall, no critical issues were observed in terms of programming style correctness or logic accuracy. Please feel free to ask if you need more assistance beyond what appears in plain text! Enjoy coding!
} | ||
return nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (n NginxService) Build(req request.NginxBuildReq) error { | ||
nginxInstall, err := getAppInstallByKey(constant.AppOpenresty) | ||
if err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference between the two code snippets is that one does not declare methods like "ClearProxyCache()" whereas the other calls this method in its implementation.
Potential improvement could be to ensure consistency with regards naming conventions or to add documentation and comments for the functions so developers are aware of their intended purpose. However, there might not be much deviation from standards since both pieces of code seem well-written with no major syntax issues found here. It would also help to clarify if these services need to be compatible across multiple versions and environments which may determine any necessary optimizations.
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.