fix: Fix the problem that the terminal exit fails #8189
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| } | ||
| dt := time.Now().Add(time.Second) | ||
| _ = wsConn.WriteControl(websocket.CloseMessage, nil, dt) | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func loadRedisInitCmd(c *gin.Context) (string, string, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There seem to be no significant changes between the two versions of the provided Go code that could cause issues or performance bottlenecks. The primary difference appears to be in handling WebSocket connections within different methods, WsSsh and ContainerWsSSH, without substantial modification.
Here are a few observations:
- Both functions use the same logic for closing the websocket connection using the
WriteControlmethod with aCloseMessage. - They handle errors similarly by calling the same function (
wshandleError) followed by returning if it returns true. - There is slight code repetition in both functions, which could theoretically be optimized slightly.
For further improvement:
- Code DRYness: Combine similar sections of code, especially around error handling, into helper functions where applicable.
- Documentation Updates: Ensure comments and documentation accuratelyreflect the current functionality, especially regarding when the
QuitChanis handled.
In summary, the code remains mostly functional and should work correctly as implemented. However, there's scope for minor clean-up related to redundancy and improved readability.
| term.value.write('The connection has been disconnected.'); | ||
| term.value.write(ev.reason); | ||
| term.value?.write('The connection has been disconnected.'); | ||
| term.value?.write(ev.reason); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const isWsOpen = () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are no significant irregularities, potential issues, or optimization suggestions in the provided code changes. The most noticeable update from one line to another is using Number() when clearing the timer and ensuring that term.value exists before calling methods on it to avoid potential errors.
| @@ -100,4 +100,5 @@ func (lcmd *LocalCommand) Wait(quitChan chan bool) { | |||
| global.LOG.Errorf("ssh session wait failed, err: %v", err) | |||
| setQuit(quitChan) | |||
| } | |||
| setQuit(quitChan) | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code snippet is mostly correct, but there are some minor improvements and clarifications that can be made:
Improvements
-
Redundant Line: The line
setQuit(quitChan)appears twice at different positions in the function. While it's not strictly necessary, you might want to decide whether one of these should be removed. -
Logical Clarity: Consider adding a comment above this block explaining its purpose. This helps improve readability.
-
Error Handling: Ensure that
erris defined before using it to prevent potential runtime errors.
Here's an updated version with these considerations:
@@ -97,5 +96,8 @@ func (lcmd *LocalCommand) Wait(quitChan chan bool) {
global.LOG.Errorf("ssh session wait failed, err: %v", err)
setQuit(quitChan)
}
+
+ // Function waits for SSH session to complete, handling any errors encountered.
+ // It also ensures that the quit channel is properly closed if an error occurs.
+ // Note: setQuit(quitChan) is called again here to ensure proper resource management.
+ setQuit(quitChan)
}Optimization Suggestions:
-
Avoid Redundancy: If only the first call to
setQuit(quitChan)is needed, consider removing the second call. Only do what needs to be done once unless both calls have specific purposes. -
Consistent Naming: Consistently name variables and functions to improve maintainability and reduce bugs.
By making these adjustments, the code becomes more readable and potentially more efficient.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.