Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Using latest postmark #71

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023
Merged

Using latest postmark #71

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023

Conversation

tomek-ac
Copy link
Contributor

  • Removed direct dependency on request
  • Using latest postmark package

@tomek-ac tomek-ac requested a review from derekrushforth May 17, 2023 10:34
@tomek-ac
Copy link
Contributor Author

@derekrushforth when you find a moment could you please take a look at this and see if works as expected? The tests seem to be passing so I guess it should be good.

Copy link
Contributor

@derekrushforth derekrushforth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything seems to be working as expected for me. Thanks @tomek-ac

@tomek-ac tomek-ac merged commit d4296fb into main Jun 20, 2023
@tomek-ac tomek-ac deleted the upgraded-postmark branch June 20, 2023 22:49
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants