Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix: artifact upload version #1562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

fix: artifact upload version #1562

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

saravmajestic
Copy link
Collaborator

@saravmajestic saravmajestic commented Jan 24, 2025

Overview

Problem

Unit tests are failing, because of deprecated upload-artifact package

Solution

Update package version

Screenshot/Demo

A picture is worth a thousand words. Please highlight the changes if applicable.

How to test

  • Steps to be followed to verify the solution or code changes
  • Mention if there is any settings configuration added/changed/deleted

Checklist

  • I have run this code and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • README.md updated and added information about my change

Important

Update actions/upload-artifact to v4 in tests.yml to fix unit test failures due to deprecation.

  • GitHub Actions:
    • Update actions/upload-artifact from v3 to v4 in tests.yml for test results and coverage results upload steps.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 1c0e62d. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to use the latest version of actions/upload-artifact action.

@saravmajestic saravmajestic self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow configuration file .github/workflows/tests.yml by upgrading the actions/upload-artifact action from version 3 to version 4. This change involves two specific artifact upload steps, which now use the latest version of the action. The workflow's core logic, conditions, and overall structure remain consistent, with only the action version being modified.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/tests.yml Updated actions/upload-artifact action from v3 to v4 for test results and coverage results artifact uploads

Suggested Reviewers

  • mdesmet

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@saravmajestic saravmajestic requested a review from mdesmet January 24, 2025 02:58
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 1c0e62d in 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 21 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/tests.yml:50
  • Draft comment:
    Updated upload-artifact action to v4. Ensure compatibility with other actions and the workflow.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The PR updates the version of the upload-artifact action from v3 to v4. This change is consistent across both instances in the workflow file.

Workflow ID: wflow_xaiN9ffgyc3SpC1c


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)

50-53: LGTM! Consider adding retention-days parameter.

The upgrade to upload-artifact@v4 is appropriate and aligns with best practices.

Consider adding the retention-days parameter to manage artifact storage:

 uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
 with:
   name: test-results-${{ matrix.os }}
   path: test-results/
+  retention-days: 5

Line range hint 1-72: Consider workflow optimizations for faster CI.

The workflow structure is well-organized, but here are some optimization suggestions:

  1. Consider using actions/setup-node@v4 instead of v3
  2. Add concurrency limits to cancel outdated workflow runs
  3. Use composite actions to reduce duplication across OS-specific test runs

Example concurrency configuration:

concurrency:
  group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
  cancel-in-progress: true
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51c5cf4 and 1c0e62d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/tests.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)

Line range hint 57-63: LGTM! Verify CodeCov integration.

The upgrade to upload-artifact@v4 is correct and maintains version consistency.

Let's verify that the coverage upload paths align with what CodeCov expects:

✅ Verification successful

Coverage artifact paths verified and correctly configured

The upload paths align perfectly with Jest/Istanbul coverage output and CodeCov's requirements. The codecov.yml configuration is properly set up with appropriate thresholds and exclusions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the coverage paths match CodeCov's requirements

# Search for any CodeCov configuration files
echo "Checking for codecov.yml configuration..."
fd 'codecov.yml|.codecov.yml'

# Check if the coverage paths are referenced in other workflow files
echo "Checking coverage paths in other workflows..."
rg -A 5 'coverage/|.nyc_output/|\.lcov' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 974


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check codecov.yml configuration
echo "CodeCov Configuration:"
cat codecov.yml

# Verify if there are any coverage report generation commands
echo -e "\nCoverage Generation Commands:"
rg -B 2 -A 2 'nyc|coverage' package.json

Length of output: 1172

@mdesmet mdesmet merged commit 71028ac into master Jan 24, 2025
13 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants