Skip to content

Aretno/ic-workshop

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits
 
 

Repository files navigation

IC workshop 2017-02-25

The idea

Below I set out a proposed order of activities to do, in order to get used to the most common Git and Github operations you will need to perform while working on IC.

Please talk to me for clarification of what each item means.

These are just proposals for things that should be useful to do, but, at any stage, we can talk about any aspect of IC development. The point of the day is to be as useful to you as possible.

Please do everything in pairs.

Most of the steps should be repeated many times, as many as it takes for you to start feeling comfortable with them. We can always come back to any of them later, so that you can get more practice or clarification.

At this point, we are doing absolutely no programming whatsoever, merely getting used to working with Magit and Github, and trying to understand the IC workflow. So just create and modify files containing any text you like. The content of the files does not matter at this point: we want to perform lots and lots of Git operations over and over again, without getting distracted by any specific programming domain.

Do not work in the same pair all day long: the pairs should be split up and mixed every now and then. Seeing different people's perspectives and styles is an interesting exercise in itself.

Preliminaries

  • Make sure you have a graphical emacs installed. On OS X Emacs for Max OS X is a good option.

  • Make sure that you have magit and helm installed. The simplest way is to use the init file provided by IC, by placing it in ~.emacs.d. This will automatically download and configure magit and helm on first use.

Git, Magit, and Github exercises

  • Upload your ssh keys to Github

  • git clone git@github.com:jacg/ic-workshop.git

  • stage & commit a few times on the master branch

  • create new branch, few commits, merge

  • few commits, rebase

  • observe what happens to the log when you merge as opposed to rebasing

  • repeat playing with branches, merging vs rebasing

  • In IC you can do whatever you want on branches in your local repo or your fork, but in the central nextic repo we do not want to see any merge commits, unless there is some particularly compelling reason for one.

    By default there are no merge commits in nextic central repo!

    This means that someone will have to rewrite your history before your work is admitted into the central repo.

  • selective stage

  • commit extend, reword, amend

  • r i swap

  • r i squash

  • push

  • push -f

  • JG push to central

  • fetch, rebase (reset b x (move branch pointer))

  • pull request

  • repeat until understood

  • partial staging

  • reset X (soft, hard, mixed, etc.)

  • stash

Discussion

After doing these exercises, we should have an open discussion to consider the following questions

  • What are the git operations you will use most?
  • What does the IC workflow look like?
  • How do we use branches?
  • What is a pull request?
  • How do you Collaborate with others before a pull request?

Testing with pytest

  • I you have not done so already, install spyder: conda install spyder.

  • pip install

    • hypothesis-numpy
    • flaky
    • pytest-xdist
  • Set up travis for your repo. Ensure that you test on more than one version of Python, including at least one version of Python 2 and one version of Python 3.

  • Push your changes to your fork every now and then, and observe Travis in action.

  • For each of the following Python features

    • Understand and document it, by writing tests.
    • Implement it.

It would probably be interesting to split pairs in the middle each of these, to see how diffrently others might perceive the same task!

But, before we do any of that, first ...

Mystery exercise

Let's play a game.

  • The game has two players (or teams): the testers and the implementors.

  • The testers write tests

  • The implementors try to pass them ...

  • ... by engaging the the standard TDD practice: do the simplest thing that will pass the test.

  • But with a twist: the implementors should maliciously try to write a buggy implementation that passes all the given tests.

  • But let's start by keeping the meaning of the feature secret: the implementors will not know the higher-level meaning of what they are meant to implement. The only communication between the testers and the implementors will be the tests.

functools.partial

enumerate

  • Make sure that it works both in Python 2 and 3

  • Implement it in 3 ways

    1. as a class
    2. using generator functions
    3. using 'itertools'

For the second one, it would be best if you start in pairs where at least one of you is familiar with generator functions (yield).

  • Submit each one as a separate commit in your repository.

  • Extract all three implementations from history into the same module.

  • Parametrize the tests to test all 3.

  • Now replace the parametrization with a parametrized fixture.

collections.namedtuple

Pytest features to observe

  • -k
  • -v
  • --pdb
  • --tb
  • -m and marks
  • --maxfail
  • -s

IC exercises

Here are some exercises we can try in the actual IC codebase. Feel free to propose your own.

Everyone should do the cosmetics exercise, the rest are up to you.

Cosmetics

This exercise should run continuously, in parallel with any other IC exercises you are doing. The idea is to simulate lots of need for pushing, pulling and rebasing, and to demonstrate collaborative development on a side branch.

At the end of the day, we will squash and merge all cosmetic changes into master.

  • Make small cosmetic changes to some IC code, on a branch called cosmetics.

  • Push them to your fork of nextic.

  • Add remotes for at least two other people's forks.

  • Keep doing this repeatedly in small chunks: hopefully you'll get to interact with the work of others on the same branch.

config.py and argparse

This is a very straightforward exercise which should show you the value of having a good set of tests while refactoring, and get you into the habit of pressing the test button.

At the moment IC's core/config.py:configure function returns a dictionary containing the configuration settings. This information would be more conveniently accessible from an arparse.Namespace object (the type that argparse uses to store the parsed command line information); compare

CFP['OPTION']
CFP.OPTION

Change the code in IC from the former to the latter style. This requires two changes:

  1. Make configure return an argparse.Namespace rather than a dict.

  2. Change the lookup of configuration options from the dict style to the namespace style, wherever it is necssary in the whole of the IC codebase.

How will you know that you have changed it correctly everywhere?

Remove any redundant functions you find in the module.

City run functions

  • Turn IRENE, ISIDORA, MAURILIA etc. into classmethods with the same name. Inherit as much common functionality as possible.

  • Refactor the test fixtures that use these methods.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published