-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
fix: docker api parallel exec, git config, wrong dir cardinal editor #74
Conversation
Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into mainAdd the label “graphite/merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. # using this link. |
WalkthroughThe changes encompass various modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on improving context management, error handling, and simplifying method signatures in Docker-related commands. Key alterations include the removal of configuration parameters from several Docker client methods, enhancing the handling of context cancellation, and updating the import paths for certain functionalities. Additionally, a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #74 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 49.08% 45.85% -3.24%
==========================================
Files 52 54 +2
Lines 2357 2617 +260
==========================================
+ Hits 1157 1200 +43
- Misses 997 1216 +219
+ Partials 203 201 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
d518417
to
e00d350
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The cleaner fix here is to do the git commit with an author flag like this such that the problem doesn't exist in the first place
git commit --author="World CLI no-reply@world.dev" -m "whatever"
oh man, this is a very good approach. I didn't think about that. 👍🏻 |
e00d350
to
b4a4011
Compare
@smsunarto i think the approach using i will bring back the checkGitConfig func. |
b4a4011
to
edf8145
Compare
Oh apparently it just lacks env. we can use :
|
edf8145
to
55608ae
Compare
ef6982b
to
0308c8f
Compare
55608ae
to
6052ac7
Compare
0308c8f
to
c5b6dbe
Compare
6052ac7
to
096d3c4
Compare
Merge activity
|
c5b6dbe
to
6eee015
Compare
Closes: WORLD-1177 ## Overview When user trying to exec `world create` but git configuration `.gitconfig` for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created. The issue is because on the last step of `world create` it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in `.gitconfig` Solutions Before executing `world create`, world cli will check the git configuration is configured or not. if it's not, world cli will tell the command how to configure the git config. ## Brief Changelog - Create func for checking git configuration - Call the function at the first execution of `world create` command ## Testing and Verifying - Added unit test for checkGitConfig func
096d3c4
to
4401cda
Compare
Closes: WORLD-1177 ## Overview When user trying to exec `world create` but git configuration `.gitconfig` for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created. The issue is because on the last step of `world create` it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in `.gitconfig` Solutions Before executing `world create`, world cli will check the git configuration is configured or not. if it's not, world cli will tell the command how to configure the git config. ## Brief Changelog - Create func for checking git configuration - Call the function at the first execution of `world create` command ## Testing and Verifying - Added unit test for checkGitConfig func
4401cda
to
8bf9975
Compare
Closes: WORLD-1177 ## Overview When user trying to exec `world create` but git configuration `.gitconfig` for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created. The issue is because on the last step of `world create` it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in `.gitconfig` Solutions Before executing `world create`, world cli will check the git configuration is configured or not. if it's not, world cli will tell the command how to configure the git config. ## Brief Changelog - Create func for checking git configuration - Call the function at the first execution of `world create` command ## Testing and Verifying - Added unit test for checkGitConfig func
8bf9975
to
3cdcffb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 39
🧹 Outside diff range comments (6)
cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (1)
Line range hint
46-46
: Consider using a structured logging approachCurrently, the success message is printed directly to stdout using
fmt.Println
. While this works, it might be beneficial to use a more structured logging approach, especially if there's a possibility that the output might need to be parsed programmatically in the future.Consider using a logging library or a consistent output format across the CLI. For example:
cmd.Printf("status: success\nmessage: Cardinal successfully stopped\n")This approach would make it easier to parse the output if needed, while still providing a clear message to the user.
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1)
Line range hint
32-32
: Consider handling potential errors fromdockerClient.Close()
While the current implementation defers the closure of the Docker client, it doesn't check for any errors that might occur during the close operation. Consider wrapping the
defer dockerClient.Close()
in a function that can handle potential errors, like this:defer func() { if closeErr := dockerClient.Close(); closeErr != nil { // Log the error or update the returned error if it's nil if err == nil { err = closeErr } else { err = fmt.Errorf("multiple errors occurred: %v; %v", err, closeErr) } } }()This ensures that any errors occurring during the closure of the Docker client are properly handled and reported.
common/teacmd/git.go (1)
Line range hint
1-214
: Overall, the changes effectively address the PR objectives.The modifications to the
git
andGitCloneCmd
functions successfully resolve the issue of setting Git committer information when executing theworld create
command. By using environment variables and the--author
flag, the solution ensures that commits are made with consistent and specified author details, even when the user's Git configuration is not set up.These changes align well with the PR objectives and the linked issue WORLD-1177. They provide a robust solution that prevents errors related to missing Git configuration and improves the user experience of the World CLI.
To further enhance this implementation, consider:
- Adding configuration options to allow users to customize the committer information if needed.
- Using shared variables for author name and email to improve maintainability.
- Adding clear documentation or user prompts about the default Git configuration used by the CLI.
These enhancements would make the solution more flexible and user-friendly while maintaining its effectiveness in addressing the original issue.
cmd/world/root/create.go (1)
Line range hint
1-231
: Missing implementation of Git configuration check.The PR objectives and linked issue (WORLD-1177) mention adding a check for Git configuration before executing the
world create
command. However, this implementation is missing from the current changes. Please add thecheckGitConfig
function and integrate it into the command execution flow, preferably at the beginning of theUpdate
method or in theInit
function.Consider adding the following:
- Implement the
checkGitConfig
function:func checkGitConfig() error { cmd := exec.Command("git", "config", "user.name") if err := cmd.Run(); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("Git user.name is not set. Please run 'git config --global user.name \"Your Name\"'") } cmd = exec.Command("git", "config", "user.email") if err := cmd.Run(); err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("Git user.email is not set. Please run 'git config --global user.email \"your.email@example.com\"'") } return nil }
- Call this function at the beginning of the
Update
method or in theInit
function:func (m WorldCreateModel) Init() tea.Cmd { if err := checkGitConfig(); err != nil { return func() tea.Msg { return steps.SignalStepErrorMsg{Err: err} } } // ... rest of the Init function }This implementation will ensure that the Git configuration is checked before proceeding with the
world create
command, addressing the issue mentioned in the PR objectives.common/editor/editor.go (2)
Line range hint
1-424
: Implementation of Git configuration check is missing.The PR objectives mention adding a check for Git configuration before executing the
world create
command. However, this implementation is missing from the current changes.Please implement the
checkGitConfig
function as described in the PR objectives. This function should:
- Check if the Git username and email are configured.
- If not configured, provide instructions to the user on how to set them up.
- Be called at the start of the
world create
command execution.Additionally, consider adding unit tests for the new
checkGitConfig
function to ensure its functionality.
Line range hint
1-424
: Summary of review findings and next steps
The renaming of
TargetEditorDir
toEditorDir
has been implemented consistently throughout the file. These changes look good and maintain the existing functionality.The critical feature of checking Git configuration before executing the
world create
command is missing from this implementation. This needs to be addressed as it's a key objective of the PR.Next steps:
- Implement the
checkGitConfig
function as described in the PR objectives.- Add unit tests for the new
checkGitConfig
function.- Integrate the
checkGitConfig
function into theworld create
command execution flow.- Update the PR description to reflect these additional changes once implemented.
Please make these changes and request another review when ready.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go (0 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/start.go (2 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/root/create.go (2 hunks)
- common/docker/client.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_container.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_image.go (5 hunks)
- common/docker/client_network.go (1 hunks)
- common/docker/client_test.go (8 hunks)
- common/docker/client_util.go (0 hunks)
- common/docker/client_volume.go (1 hunks)
- common/editor/editor.go (4 hunks)
- common/editor/editor_test.go (2 hunks)
- common/teacmd/git.go (2 hunks)
- tea/component/multispinner/multispinner.go (1 hunks)
- tea/style/util.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go
- common/docker/client_util.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go
[warning] 137-138: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L137-L138
Added lines #L137 - L138 were not covered by tests
[warning] 150-150: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by tests
[warning] 252-252: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L252
Added line #L252 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testscmd/world/evm/stop.go
[warning] 30-30: cmd/world/evm/stop.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client.go
[warning] 79-81: common/docker/client.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by tests
[warning] 88-88: common/docker/client.go#L88
Added line #L88 was not covered by tests
[warning] 110-110: common/docker/client.go#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
[warning] 127-127: common/docker/client.go#L127
Added line #L127 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_container.go
[warning] 92-101: common/docker/client_container.go#L92-L101
Added lines #L92 - L101 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-117: common/docker/client_container.go#L117
Added line #L117 was not covered by tests
[warning] 124-124: common/docker/client_container.go#L124
Added line #L124 was not covered by tests
[warning] 129-129: common/docker/client_container.go#L129
Added line #L129 was not covered by tests
[warning] 255-255: common/docker/client_container.go#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by tests
[warning] 281-281: common/docker/client_container.go#L281
Added line #L281 was not covered by tests
[warning] 298-298: common/docker/client_container.go#L298
Added line #L298 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_image.go
[warning] 30-30: common/docker/client_image.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-39: common/docker/client_image.go#L32-L39
Added lines #L32 - L39 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: common/docker/client_image.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-48: common/docker/client_image.go#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests
[warning] 51-51: common/docker/client_image.go#L51
Added line #L51 was not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: common/docker/client_image.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 55-55: common/docker/client_image.go#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: common/docker/client_image.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 59-64: common/docker/client_image.go#L59-L64
Added lines #L59 - L64 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-78: common/docker/client_image.go#L67-L78
Added lines #L67 - L78 were not covered by tests
[warning] 80-80: common/docker/client_image.go#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
[warning] 83-85: common/docker/client_image.go#L83-L85
Added lines #L83 - L85 were not covered by tests
[warning] 91-92: common/docker/client_image.go#L91-L92
Added lines #L91 - L92 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (25)
tea/style/util.go (2)
1-7
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name 'style' is fitting for the functionality provided. The imports are relevant, using the standard
fmt
package for output and thelipgloss
library for text styling.
1-19
: Overall assessment: Good addition with room for minor improvements.This new file introduces useful utility functions for styled console output. The
ContextPrint
andForegroundPrint
functions provide a clean API for formatting and coloring text output.Key points:
- The package structure and naming are appropriate.
- The functions are well-named and their purposes are clear.
- The use of the
lipgloss
library for styling is consistent.Suggestions for improvement:
- Make
ContextPrint
more flexible by allowing customization of all colors.- Add basic error handling in
ForegroundPrint
for invalid color inputs.- Consider adding documentation comments for both functions to improve code readability and usage understanding.
These changes will enhance the robustness and usability of the utility functions while maintaining their simplicity.
cmd/world/evm/stop.go (1)
30-30
:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate tests to cover the new changes.
The static analysis indicates that the new line is not covered by tests. It's important to ensure that all changes, especially those involving core functionality like stopping services, are properly tested.
Please update the existing tests or add new ones to cover this change. This might involve:
- Mocking the
dockerClient.Stop
method to verify it's called with the correct context and services.- Testing error scenarios to ensure proper error handling.
- Verifying that the success message is printed when the operation succeeds.
Example test case:
func TestStopCmd(t *testing.T) { mockDockerClient := &mocks.DockerClient{} mockDockerClient.On("Stop", mock.Anything, service.EVM, service.CelestiaDevNet).Return(nil) cmd := &cobra.Command{} err := stopCmd.RunE(cmd, nil) assert.NoError(t, err) mockDockerClient.AssertExpectations(t) }To check the current test coverage for this file, you can run:
This will show the current coverage for the
stop.go
file, helping to verify if the new changes are adequately tested.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: cmd/world/evm/stop.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (1)
41-41
: Excellent addition of context to the Stop method!The inclusion of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument todockerClient.Stop()
is a valuable improvement. This change allows for better management of the operation's lifecycle, including potential cancellation and timeout handling. It aligns with Go best practices for using contexts in long-running operations or those that may need to be cancelled.This modification enhances the robustness and responsiveness of the stop command, particularly in scenarios where the operation might need to be interrupted or when working with timeouts.
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1)
37-37
: Excellent addition of context todockerClient.Purge
!The inclusion of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument todockerClient.Purge
is a valuable improvement. This change enhances the method's ability to handle cancellation and timeouts effectively during the purge operation, aligning with best practices for context usage in Go.cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The change from
teacmd
toeditor
is consistent with the refactoring mentioned in the AI summary. This update aligns with the subsequent changes in the function.
20-20
: Verify if these changes are related to the PR objectives.The changes in this file (
cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go
) are not mentioned in the PR objectives, which focus on checking Git configuration before executing theworld create
command. Can you confirm if these changes are intentional and how they relate to the stated PR objectives?To help verify the relevance of these changes, you can run the following script:
This will help determine if these changes were discussed or mentioned in the PR context.
Also applies to: 25-25
✅ Verification successful
Changes Related to PR Objectives Confirmed
The modifications in
cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go
are aligned with the PR objectives concerning Git configuration checks before executing theworld create
command. These changes are intentional and enhance the editor setup functionality as part of this PR.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the changes in this file are mentioned in the PR description or comments # Test: Search for mentions of 'cardinal', 'editor', or 'util_editor.go' in PR description and comments gh pr view 74 --json body,comments | jq -r '.body, .comments[].body' | grep -iE 'cardinal|editor|util_editor\.go'Length of output: 2574
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1)
42-42
: Approve the simplification of theRestart
method call.The removal of the
cfg
parameter from thedockerClient.Restart
method call aligns with the simplification of Docker-related commands mentioned in the AI summary. This change appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort.To ensure the change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify:
- The
Restart
method in the Docker client no longer requires thecfg
parameter.- The functionality of the restart command remains intact without the
cfg
parameter.Additionally, consider the following:
- Check if any imports or variables have become unused due to this change and can be removed.
- Ensure that the documentation for the
Restart
method is updated to reflect this change.Run the following script to verify the
Restart
method signature and its usage across the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Restart method signature is correct and no unintended
cfg
usages found.The
Restart
method incmd/world/cardinal/restart.go
correctly no longer includes thecfg
parameter, and no existing calls toRestart
are usingcfg
incorrectly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Restart method signature and its usage # Test 1: Check the Restart method signature echo "Checking Restart method signature:" ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_) Restart(ctx context.Context, services ...service.Service) error' # Test 2: Check for any remaining usage of cfg in Restart method calls echo "Checking for cfg usage in Restart method calls:" rg --type go 'Restart\(.*cfg.*\)'Length of output: 423
cmd/world/evm/start.go (1)
84-84
: LGTM: Consistent simplification of Start method callThe simplification of the
dockerClient.Start
method call in thevalidateDevDALayer
function is consistent with the changes made in thestartCmd
function. This change aligns well with the updated method signature and improves code consistency.common/docker/client.go (4)
138-147
: LGTM on Restart method refactoring.The changes in the
Restart
method, including the removal of thecfg
parameter from the method signature and the use of updatedStop
andStart
method signatures, are consistent with the refactoring done in other methods. This improves overall code consistency and maintainability.
99-127
: LGTM on Stop and Purge method refactoring, but consider improving test coverage.The refactoring of the
Stop
andPurge
methods to use theprocessMultipleContainers
method and the removal of thecfg
parameter from their signatures are good improvements. These changes are consistent with the refactoring done in theStart
method and improve overall code consistency.However, the static analysis tool indicates that the error handling on lines 110 and 127 is not covered by tests. Consider adding unit tests to cover these error cases. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the processMultipleContainers calls in the Stop and Purge methods # Test: Search for test cases related to processMultipleContainers in the Stop and Purge methods rg --type go -i 'func Test(Stop|Purge).*processMultipleContainers.*error' test/If no results are found, it confirms that test coverage is missing for these error handling cases.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 110-110: common/docker/client.go#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
[warning] 127-127: common/docker/client.go#L127
Added line #L127 was not covered by tests
85-89
: LGTM on container starting refactoring, but consider improving test coverage.The refactoring of the container starting process into the
processMultipleContainers
method is a good improvement. It enhances code organization and potentially allows for reuse in other methods.However, the static analysis tool indicates that the error handling on line 88 is not covered by tests. Consider adding unit tests to cover this error case. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the processMultipleContainers call in the Start method # Test: Search for test cases related to processMultipleContainers in the Start method rg --type go -i 'func TestStart.*processMultipleContainers.*error' test/If no results are found, it confirms that test coverage is missing for this error handling case.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 88-88: common/docker/client.go#L88
Added line #L88 was not covered by tests
77-83
: LGTM on image building logic, but consider adding tests.The addition of the image building step when the
Build
flag is set is a good improvement. It ensures that images are built before containers are started, which is a logical sequence of operations.However, the static analysis tool indicates that this block is not covered by tests. Consider adding unit tests to cover this new functionality. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
If no results are found, it confirms that test coverage is missing for this new block.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 79-81: common/docker/client.go#L79-L81
Added lines #L79 - L81 were not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1)
123-126
: LGTM! Simplified method call and improved error handling.The changes look good:
- Removal of the
cfg
parameter simplifies theStart
method call.- The updated error handling provides more context, which is beneficial for debugging.
To ensure this change doesn't impact the functionality, please verify that the
Start
method in theDockerClient
no longer requires thecfg
parameter and that all necessary configuration is still accessible within the method. Run the following script to check theStart
method signature:cmd/world/root/create.go (3)
11-11
: LGTM: Import change is correct.The addition of the
editor
package import is consistent with the changes made in theUpdate
method.
127-127
: LGTM: Update method change is correct.The replacement of
teacmd.SetupCardinalEditor
witheditor.SetupCardinalEditor
is consistent with the new import and appears to be a proper refactoring of the function's package location.
Line range hint
1-231
: Summary of review findings
- The package refactoring changes (import and
Update
method modification) are correct and approved.- The critical feature of checking Git configuration before executing the
world create
command is missing and needs to be implemented as per the PR objectives and linked issue (WORLD-1177).Please address the missing Git configuration check to fully meet the objectives of this pull request.
After implementing the Git configuration check, please run the following script to verify its integration:
This script will help ensure that the Git configuration check has been properly implemented and integrated into the command execution flow.
common/docker/client_test.go (5)
87-94
: LGTM! Changes are consistent with previous updates.The changes in the TestStop function are consistent with the updates made in TestStart. The Docker client is properly initialized and used for both Start and Stop operations.
110-117
: LGTM! Changes maintain consistency across test functions.The changes in the TestRestart function maintain consistency with the updates made in TestStart and TestStop. The Docker client is properly initialized and used for Start and Restart operations.
133-138
: LGTM! Changes are consistent and well-implemented.The changes in the TestPurge function are consistent with the updates made in previous test functions. The Docker client is properly initialized and used for Start and Purge operations.
196-203
: LGTM! Changes are well-implemented and consistent.The changes in the TestBuild function are well-implemented. The Docker client is properly initialized, and the pullImages and buildImage operations are called with the correct context and service.
Line range hint
1-246
: Overall, the changes improve test structure and Docker client usage.The updates to this file consistently improve the Docker client initialization and usage across all test functions. The changes align well with the PR objectives of enhancing context management and error handling. Here's a summary of the improvements:
- Docker client is now initialized locally in each test function, improving test isolation.
- Context is consistently used in Docker operations, enhancing control over timeouts and cancellation.
- The cleanUp function now accepts a *Client, which is more logical given the changes.
These changes should result in more reliable and maintainable tests. The suggestions provided in the review comments, if implemented, would further enhance the robustness of the test suite.
common/editor/editor.go (2)
80-81
: LGTM! Consistent updates to use the newEditorDir
constant.The changes in the
SetupCardinalEditor
function correctly implement the renaming ofTargetEditorDir
toEditorDir
. The logic for checking and removing the existing editor directory remains intact, ensuring the functionality is preserved.Also applies to: 83-83, 89-89
25-25
: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The renaming of
TargetEditorDir
toEditorDir
is consistent with the PR objectives. This change improves clarity and maintains the same functionality.To ensure all references have been updated, run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Renaming Complete
All instances of
TargetEditorDir
have been successfully renamed toEditorDir
across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of TargetEditorDir rg "TargetEditorDir" --type goLength of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of TargetEditorDir in all files rg "TargetEditorDir"Length of output: 20
common/docker/client_network.go (1)
16-17
: Ensure context cancellation is properly handledThe
cancel
function returned bycontext.WithCancel
may not be invoked if themultispinner
does not call it under all circumstances. This could lead to resource leaks due to lingering contexts. Verify thatcancel
is called in all execution paths to properly release resources.
Closes: WORLD-1177 ## Overview When user trying to exec `world create` but git configuration `.gitconfig` for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created. The issue is because on the last step of `world create` it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in `.gitconfig` Solutions Before executing `world create`, world cli will check the git configuration is configured or not. if it's not, world cli will tell the command how to configure the git config. ## Brief Changelog - Create func for checking git configuration - Call the function at the first execution of `world create` command ## Testing and Verifying - Added unit test for checkGitConfig func
3cdcffb
to
a7c9362
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 38
🧹 Outside diff range comments (6)
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (2)
Line range hint
30-32
: Consider handling the error from dockerClient.Close()While deferring the closure of the Docker client is good practice, it's worth noting that
Close()
can return an error. Consider wrapping this in a named return error to ensure any closure errors are caught and reported.Here's a suggestion for handling the error:
var err error defer func() { if closeErr := dockerClient.Close(); closeErr != nil { err = fmt.Errorf("error closing Docker client: %w", closeErr) } }()
Line range hint
37-41
: Improve error handling and user feedbackThe success message is printed regardless of whether the purge operation succeeded. Consider moving the success message inside the error check to ensure it's only displayed when the operation is successful. Additionally, you might want to provide more detailed feedback to the user during the purge process.
Here's a suggestion for improved error handling and user feedback:
fmt.Println("Starting Cardinal purge...") err = dockerClient.Purge(cmd.Context(), service.Nakama, service.Cardinal, service.NakamaDB, service.Redis) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to purge Cardinal: %w", err) } fmt.Println("Cardinal successfully purged")For even better user experience, consider using a progress indicator or more detailed status updates during the purge process, especially if it's a long-running operation.
cmd/world/root/create.go (2)
Line range hint
89-180
: Consider improving Git configuration handling.While the changes address the Cardinal Editor setup, the current implementation doesn't explicitly handle the Git configuration issues mentioned in the PR objectives (WORLD-1177). Consider adding a step to check and set Git configuration using environment variables as discussed in the PR comments.
Here's a suggestion for improvement:
- Add a new step in the
createSteps
slice to check Git configuration.- Implement a function to set
GIT_COMMITTER_NAME
andGIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL
environment variables if not configured.- Update the
Update
method to handle this new step, providing informative messages to users about Git configuration.This enhancement would align better with the PR objectives and improve the user experience by preventing Git-related errors during the create process.
Line range hint
1-236
: Summary of review for cmd/world/root/create.goThe changes made to this file partially address the PR objectives:
- The Cardinal Editor setup has been updated, potentially fixing the directory creation issue.
- Import statements have been correctly modified to support the changes.
However, to fully meet the PR objectives:
- Consider implementing the suggested improvements for Git configuration handling to address WORLD-1177.
- Ensure that the Cardinal Editor setup change correctly resolves WORLD-1189.
Overall, the changes are a step in the right direction, but additional modifications could further improve the functionality and user experience of the
world create
command.cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1)
Line range hint
81-81
: Redundant Timeout SettingThe line
cfg.Timeout = -1
sets the timeout to-1
, but sincecfg
is no longer passed todockerClient.Start
, this setting might have no effect. Consider removing this line if it's unnecessary.common/docker/client_container.go (1)
Line range hint
162-169
: Handle the case when the container does not exist appropriatelyIn
stopContainer
andremoveContainer
, when the container does not exist, the functions returnerr
, which may benil
. This could lead to unexpected behavior since the functions would returnnil
even though the container does not exist. Consider returning an explicit error to indicate that the container was not found.Apply this diff to return an explicit error:
func (c *Client) stopContainer(ctx context.Context, containerName string) error { // Check if the container exists exist, err := c.containerExists(ctx, containerName) + if err != nil { + return err + } if !exist { - return err + return eris.Errorf("Container %s does not exist", containerName) } // Stop the container err = c.client.ContainerStop(ctx, containerName, container.StopOptions{}) if err != nil { return eris.Wrapf(err, "Failed to stop container %s", containerName) } return nil }func (c *Client) removeContainer(ctx context.Context, containerName string) error { // Check if the container exists exist, err := c.containerExists(ctx, containerName) + if err != nil { + return err + } if !exist { - return err + return eris.Errorf("Container %s does not exist", containerName) } // Stop the container err = c.client.ContainerStop(ctx, containerName, container.StopOptions{}) if err != nil { return eris.Wrapf(err, "Failed to stop container %s", containerName) } // Remove the container err = c.client.ContainerRemove(ctx, containerName, container.RemoveOptions{}) if err != nil { return eris.Wrapf(err, "Failed to remove container %s", containerName) } return nil }Also applies to: 176-189
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 66-69: common/docker/client_container.go#L66-L69
Added lines #L66 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-82: common/docker/client_container.go#L73-L82
Added lines #L73 - L82 were not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: common/docker/client_container.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 105-105: common/docker/client_container.go#L105
Added line #L105 was not covered by tests
[warning] 110-110: common/docker/client_container.go#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go (0 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/start.go (2 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/root/create.go (2 hunks)
- common/docker/client.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_container.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_image.go (5 hunks)
- common/docker/client_network.go (1 hunks)
- common/docker/client_test.go (8 hunks)
- common/docker/client_util.go (0 hunks)
- common/docker/client_volume.go (1 hunks)
- common/editor/editor.go (4 hunks)
- common/editor/editor_test.go (5 hunks)
- common/teacmd/git.go (2 hunks)
- tea/component/multispinner/multispinner.go (1 hunks)
- tea/style/util.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go
- common/docker/client_util.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go
[warning] 137-138: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L137-L138
Added lines #L137 - L138 were not covered by tests
[warning] 150-150: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by tests
[warning] 252-252: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L252
Added line #L252 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testscmd/world/evm/stop.go
[warning] 30-30: cmd/world/evm/stop.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client.go
[warning] 109-111: common/docker/client.go#L109-L111
Added lines #L109 - L111 were not covered by tests
[warning] 118-118: common/docker/client.go#L118
Added line #L118 was not covered by tests
[warning] 140-140: common/docker/client.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests
[warning] 157-157: common/docker/client.go#L157
Added line #L157 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_container.go
[warning] 66-69: common/docker/client_container.go#L66-L69
Added lines #L66 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-82: common/docker/client_container.go#L73-L82
Added lines #L73 - L82 were not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: common/docker/client_container.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 105-105: common/docker/client_container.go#L105
Added line #L105 was not covered by tests
[warning] 110-110: common/docker/client_container.go#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
[warning] 236-236: common/docker/client_container.go#L236
Added line #L236 was not covered by tests
[warning] 264-264: common/docker/client_container.go#L264
Added line #L264 was not covered by tests
[warning] 281-281: common/docker/client_container.go#L281
Added line #L281 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_image.go
[warning] 30-30: common/docker/client_image.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-39: common/docker/client_image.go#L32-L39
Added lines #L32 - L39 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: common/docker/client_image.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-48: common/docker/client_image.go#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests
[warning] 51-51: common/docker/client_image.go#L51
Added line #L51 was not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: common/docker/client_image.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 55-55: common/docker/client_image.go#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: common/docker/client_image.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 59-64: common/docker/client_image.go#L59-L64
Added lines #L59 - L64 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-78: common/docker/client_image.go#L67-L78
Added lines #L67 - L78 were not covered by tests
[warning] 80-80: common/docker/client_image.go#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
[warning] 83-85: common/docker/client_image.go#L83-L85
Added lines #L83 - L85 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (21)
cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (2)
42-44
: Consider enhancing error handlingWhile the current error handling is functional, it might be helpful to provide more context when returning the error from
dockerClient.Stop()
. This could make debugging easier for users.Consider wrapping the error with additional context:
if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to stop Cardinal services: %w", err) }
41-41
: Approve: Context addition improves cancellation handlingThe addition of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument todockerClient.Stop()
is a good practice. It allows for better cancellation and timeout handling, improving the overall design of the operation.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that this change has been applied uniformly:
If this script returns any results, it might indicate inconsistent usage of the updated
Stop
method signature in other parts of the codebase.✅ Verification successful
Context addition is consistent across the codebase
The search for
dockerClient.Stop
calls outsidecmd/world/cardinal/stop.go
returned only instances wherectx
is correctly passed as the first argument. This ensures that the addition ofcmd.Context()
has been uniformly applied.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of context in Stop method calls # Test: Search for dockerClient.Stop calls without context rg --type go 'dockerClient\.Stop\s*\(' --glob '!cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go'Length of output: 193
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1)
37-37
: Excellent addition of context to the Purge method!The inclusion of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument todockerClient.Purge
is a valuable improvement. This change allows for better handling of cancellation and timeouts during the purge operation, which is crucial for long-running processes. It aligns well with Go best practices for context usage and enhances the overall robustness of the command.cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (1)
20-20
: LGTM! Verify function signatures in the new package.The changes to use
editor.SetupCardinalEditor
andeditor.EditorDir
are consistent with the import changes. The functionality appears to be maintained.To ensure the function signatures are identical in the new package, run the following script:
Also applies to: 25-25
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1)
42-42
: LGTM. Verify configuration handling in Docker client.The simplification of the
dockerClient.Restart
method call by removing thecfg
parameter looks good. This change likely aligns with a broader refactoring effort to standardize Docker client method signatures.To ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the restart operation, please verify that the necessary configuration is being handled correctly within the Docker client implementation. Run the following script to check for any configuration-related changes in the Docker client:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Docker client handles configuration internally.
The removal of the
cfg
parameter from thedockerClient.Restart
method call is safe, as the Docker client now manages configuration internally through itscfg
field.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for configuration-related changes in the Docker client implementation # Search for changes related to configuration handling in the Docker client rg --type go -g 'common/docker/**/*.go' -e 'cfg' -e 'config' -e 'configuration' # Check if there are any new methods or fields added to handle configuration ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type $_ struct { $$$ cfg $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 8474
cmd/world/evm/start.go (1)
84-84
: LGTM: Approve simplification ofdockerClient.Start
callThe simplification of the
dockerClient.Start
method call is good, aligning with the updated method signature. This change improves code consistency and readability.cmd/world/root/create.go (2)
11-11
: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import for the
editor
package is correctly added and aligns with the changes in theUpdate
method.
127-127
: Verify correct directory creation for Cardinal Editor setup.The change from
teacmd.SetupCardinalEditor
toeditor.SetupCardinalEditor
looks good and is consistent with the new import. However, please verify that this change correctly addresses the issue mentioned in WORLD-1189, ensuring that the.editor/
directory is created in the project directory rather than the/cardinal
directory.To confirm the correct directory creation, please run the following script:
common/editor/editor.go (5)
25-25
: LGTM: Constant renamed for clarity.The renaming of
TargetEditorDir
toEditorDir
improves code readability while maintaining the same value. This change is consistent and doesn't break existing functionality.
80-89
: LGTM: Consistent updates to use new constant name.The changes in the
SetupCardinalEditor
function correctly implement the use of the renamedEditorDir
constant. The logic remains intact, ensuring consistency throughout the function.As previously suggested, consider enhancing error handling by wrapping errors with additional context using
eris.Wrap
. This would provide more informative error messages if issues occur during these operations. For example:-err = copyDir(editorDir, targetEditorDir) +err = eris.Wrap(copyDir(editorDir, targetEditorDir), "failed to copy editor directory") if err != nil { return err }This suggestion applies to lines 103, 111, and 117 as well.
103-103
: LGTM: Consistent update to use new directory variable.The change in the
copyDir
function call correctly uses thetargetEditorDir
variable, maintaining consistency with the earlier updates.As previously suggested, consider enhancing error handling here by wrapping the error with additional context using
eris.Wrap
.
111-111
: LGTM: Consistent update to use new directory variable.The change in the
replaceProjectIDs
function call correctly uses thetargetEditorDir
variable, maintaining consistency with the earlier updates.As previously suggested, consider enhancing error handling here by wrapping the error with additional context using
eris.Wrap
.
117-117
: LGTM: Consistent update to use new directory variable.The change in the
addFileVersion
function call correctly uses thetargetEditorDir
variable, maintaining consistency with the earlier updates.As previously suggested, consider enhancing error handling here by wrapping the error with additional context using
eris.Wrap
.tea/component/multispinner/multispinner.go (1)
71-112
:⚠️ Potential issueUse pointer receiver for the
Update
methodThe
Update
method modifies the receiver's fieldss.spinner
ands.allDone
. In Go, methods that modify the receiver should have pointer receivers to ensure changes persist. Please change the receiver to a pointer toMultiSpinner
.Apply this diff to correct the method receiver:
-func (s MultiSpinner) Update(msg tea.Msg) (tea.Model, tea.Cmd) { +func (s *MultiSpinner) Update(msg tea.Msg) (tea.Model, tea.Cmd) { switch msg := msg.(type) { case tea.KeyMsg: // case ctrl + c if msg.String() == "ctrl+c" { if s.cancel != nil { s.cancel() } return s, tea.Quit } case spinner.TickMsg: // Update the spinner var cmd tea.Cmd s.spinner, cmd = s.spinner.Update(msg) // If all processes are done, quit after the view is updated if s.allDone { return s, tea.Batch(cmd, tea.Quit) } return s, cmd case ProcessState: s.setState(msg.Name, msg) // check if all processes are done allDone := true for _, state := range s.getStates() { if !state.Done { allDone = false break } } if allDone { // Set the flag to indicate all processes are done s.allDone = true // Return a spinner tick to update the view one last time before quitting return s, s.spinner.Tick } } return s, nil }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1)
123-126
: Verify Removal ofcfg
Parameter indockerClient.Start
You've removed the
cfg
parameter from thedockerClient.Start
call. Ensure that theStart
method and any internal functions do not rely oncfg
. This is important to prevent unexpected behaviors due to missing configurations.Run the following script to check if
cfg
is used within thedockerClient.Start
method:✅ Verification successful
Removal of
cfg
Parameter VerifiedThe
cfg
parameter has been successfully removed from thedockerClient.Start
method, and no references tocfg
were found within the method. This ensures that the removal does not impact the method's functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `cfg` is referenced in the `dockerClient.Start` method. # Test: Search for occurrences of `cfg` within the `Start` method. Expect: No matches. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (dockerClient *DockerClient) Start($_) { $$$ cfg.$_ $$$ }'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for any references to `cfg` within the `dockerClient.Start` method. # Search for any occurrence of `cfg` within the `Start` method context. rg -A 5 'func\s+\(dockerClient\s+\*DockerClient\)\s+Start\s*\(' --include '*.go' | rg 'cfg'Length of output: 533
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive check for any references to `cfg` within the `dockerClient.Start` method. # Search for any occurrence of `cfg` within the Start method context in Go files. rg -A 5 'func\s+\(dockerClient\s+\*DockerClient\)\s+Start\s*\(' --glob '*.go' | rg 'cfg'Length of output: 88
cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go (1)
147-148
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove duplicate comments
Lines 147 and 148 contain duplicate comments. Please remove one to improve code readability.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate comment:
- // Cleaning up connection // Cleanup connection
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
common/editor/editor_test.go (5)
1-1
: Package name change enhances clarity and organizationChanging the package name to
editor
aligns it with the directory structure and clarifies the purpose of the package, improving code maintainability.
22-22
: Initialize clean test environment before executionCalling
assert.NilError(t, cleanUpDir(testDir))
ensures that any residual data from previous tests is removed, preventing interference and promoting test isolation.
56-56
: Ensure cleanup of test artifacts after test executionAdding
assert.NilError(t, cleanUpDir(testDir))
at the end of the test ensures that all generated data is removed, maintaining a clean state for subsequent tests.
124-125
: Properly clean up temporary directories to prevent clutterIncluding cleanup for
"tmp"
and"tmp2"
directories ensures that temporary files and directories are removed after the test, preventing resource leaks and clutter in the filesystem.
343-345
: SimplifycleanUpDir
function with effective error handlingThe
cleanUpDir
function now succinctly removes the target directory and propagates any errors, enhancing readability and allowing callers to handle errors appropriately.
Closes: WORLD-1177 ## Overview When user trying to exec `world create` but git configuration `.gitconfig` for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created. The issue is because on the last step of `world create` it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in `.gitconfig` Solutions Before executing `world create`, world cli will check the git configuration is configured or not. if it's not, world cli will tell the command how to configure the git config. ## Brief Changelog - Create func for checking git configuration - Call the function at the first execution of `world create` command ## Testing and Verifying - Added unit test for checkGitConfig func
a7c9362
to
9888454
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (2)
Line range hint
30-32
: Consider handling the error fromdockerClient.Close()
While deferring the closure of the Docker client is good practice, the potential error from
Close()
is currently being ignored. Consider wrapping this in a named return error to ensure any closure errors are properly handled.Here's a suggested implementation:
var err error defer func() { if closeErr := dockerClient.Close(); closeErr != nil { err = fmt.Errorf("error closing Docker client: %w", closeErr) } }()This ensures that any error from closing the client is captured and returned, while still allowing the function to complete its main task.
Line range hint
37-42
: Improve error handling and user feedbackThe current implementation prints a success message regardless of whether the purge operation succeeded. Consider moving the success message inside the error check to ensure it's only displayed when the operation is truly successful.
Additionally, as purging might be a long-running operation, it would be beneficial to provide some progress feedback to the user.
Here's a suggested improvement:
fmt.Println("Starting Cardinal purge...") err = dockerClient.Purge(cmd.Context(), service.Nakama, service.Cardinal, service.NakamaDB, service.Redis) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to purge Cardinal: %w", err) } fmt.Println("Cardinal successfully purged")This change provides initial feedback, ensures the success message is only printed on successful completion, and wraps the error for more context.
Consider implementing a progress indicator or using a spinner to provide real-time feedback during the purge operation. This could significantly improve the user experience, especially for longer operations.
cmd/world/root/create.go (1)
Line range hint
127-134
: Consider improving error handling for Cardinal Editor setup.While the changes are correct, consider enhancing the error handling for the Cardinal Editor setup. Currently, if an error occurs during the setup, it's treated the same as a Git clone error. You could provide more specific error messages to help users troubleshoot issues related to the Cardinal Editor setup.
Here's a suggestion for improvement:
err := editor.SetupCardinalEditor(".", "cardinal") teaCmd := func() tea.Msg { - return teacmd.GitCloneFinishMsg{Err: err} + return teacmd.CardinalEditorSetupFinishMsg{Err: err} } return m, tea.Sequence( NewLogCmd(style.ChevronIcon.Render()+"Setting up Cardinal Editor"), teaCmd, )Then, handle this new message type in the
Update
method to provide more specific error messages for Cardinal Editor setup failures.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go (0 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go (3 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/start.go (2 hunks)
- cmd/world/evm/stop.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/world/root/create.go (2 hunks)
- common/docker/client.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_container.go (3 hunks)
- common/docker/client_image.go (5 hunks)
- common/docker/client_network.go (1 hunks)
- common/docker/client_test.go (8 hunks)
- common/docker/client_util.go (0 hunks)
- common/docker/client_volume.go (1 hunks)
- common/editor/editor.go (4 hunks)
- common/editor/editor_test.go (5 hunks)
- common/teacmd/git.go (2 hunks)
- tea/component/multispinner/multispinner.go (1 hunks)
- tea/style/util.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- cmd/world/cardinal/cardinal.go
- common/docker/client_util.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go
[warning] 137-138: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L137-L138
Added lines #L137 - L138 were not covered by tests
[warning] 150-150: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by tests
[warning] 252-252: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L252
Added line #L252 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by tests
[warning] 25-25: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testscmd/world/evm/stop.go
[warning] 30-30: cmd/world/evm/stop.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client.go
[warning] 109-111: common/docker/client.go#L109-L111
Added lines #L109 - L111 were not covered by tests
[warning] 118-118: common/docker/client.go#L118
Added line #L118 was not covered by tests
[warning] 140-140: common/docker/client.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests
[warning] 157-157: common/docker/client.go#L157
Added line #L157 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_container.go
[warning] 66-69: common/docker/client_container.go#L66-L69
Added lines #L66 - L69 were not covered by tests
[warning] 73-82: common/docker/client_container.go#L73-L82
Added lines #L73 - L82 were not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: common/docker/client_container.go#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 105-105: common/docker/client_container.go#L105
Added line #L105 was not covered by tests
[warning] 110-110: common/docker/client_container.go#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests
[warning] 236-236: common/docker/client_container.go#L236
Added line #L236 was not covered by tests
[warning] 264-264: common/docker/client_container.go#L264
Added line #L264 was not covered by tests
[warning] 281-281: common/docker/client_container.go#L281
Added line #L281 was not covered by testscommon/docker/client_image.go
[warning] 30-30: common/docker/client_image.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-39: common/docker/client_image.go#L32-L39
Added lines #L32 - L39 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: common/docker/client_image.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-48: common/docker/client_image.go#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests
[warning] 51-51: common/docker/client_image.go#L51
Added line #L51 was not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: common/docker/client_image.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 55-55: common/docker/client_image.go#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: common/docker/client_image.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 59-64: common/docker/client_image.go#L59-L64
Added lines #L59 - L64 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-78: common/docker/client_image.go#L67-L78
Added lines #L67 - L78 were not covered by tests
[warning] 80-80: common/docker/client_image.go#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
[warning] 83-85: common/docker/client_image.go#L83-L85
Added lines #L83 - L85 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (41)
tea/style/util.go (1)
3-7
: LGTM: Import section is well-organizedThe import section is correctly structured with standard library and third-party imports separated by a blank line. All imports are necessary for the functions in this file.
cmd/world/evm/stop.go (1)
30-30
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Good practice to include context.
The addition of
cmd.Context()
to thedockerClient.Stop
method is a positive change. It allows for better management of the operation's lifecycle, including cancellation and deadlines.Consider adding a timeout to the context for the
Stop
operation to ensure it doesn't hang indefinitely:ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(cmd.Context(), 30*time.Second) defer cancel() err = dockerClient.Stop(ctx, service.EVM, service.CelestiaDevNet)This addition would make the operation more robust and prevent potential hangs.
Let's verify the
Stop
method signature change in thedockerClient
:✅ Verification successful
Test Coverage Confirmed for
dockerClient.Stop
The updated
dockerClient.Stop
method is covered by existing tests incommon/docker/client_test.go
, ensuring that the change is validated. Consider adding additional test cases to cover various scenarios and edge cases for enhanced robustness.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Stop method signature in the dockerClient # Test: Search for the Stop method definition rg --type go -A 5 'func \(.*\) Stop\('Length of output: 440
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the updated dockerClient.Stop method # Search for usages of dockerClient.Stop in test files rg --type go 'dockerClient\.Stop\(.*\)' --glob '*_test.go'Length of output: 176
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: cmd/world/evm/stop.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/stop.go (2)
41-41
: Excellent addition of context to dockerClient.Stop method!The inclusion of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument todockerClient.Stop()
is a great improvement. This change allows for better cancellation and timeout handling, aligning with Go best practices for context usage. It enhances the overall design by making the operation more controllable and cancellable if needed.
42-44
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider enhancing error handling
While the current error handling is functional, it would be beneficial to provide more context when returning the error from
dockerClient.Stop()
. This could make debugging easier for users.Consider wrapping the error with additional context:
if err != nil { - return err + return fmt.Errorf("failed to stop Cardinal services: %w", err) }This change will preserve the original error while adding useful context about the operation that failed.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
cmd/world/cardinal/purge.go (1)
37-37
: Excellent addition of context todockerClient.Purge
method!The inclusion of
cmd.Context()
as the first argument in thedockerClient.Purge
method call is a positive change. This modification allows for better handling of cancellation and timeouts during the purge operation, which is crucial for long-running processes.This change aligns well with Go best practices for context usage and improves the overall robustness of the command.
cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go (2)
13-13
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The change from
teacmd
toeditor
package is consistent with the modifications described in the PR objectives. This update correctly reflects the refactoring of the package structure.
20-20
: LGTM: Function updated to use the neweditor
package.The changes in the
startCardinalEditor
function correctly reflect the transition from theteacmd
package to theeditor
package. This is consistent with the overall refactoring described in the PR objectives.Also applies to: 25-25
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 20-20: cmd/world/cardinal/util_editor.go#L20
Added line #L20 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/restart.go (1)
42-42
: LGTM! Verify impact on configuration handling.The simplification of the
dockerClient.Restart
method call looks good. It improves clarity by explicitly specifying the services to restart and uses the command context for proper cancellation support.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the rest of the codebase, please run the following verification:
This script will help verify that:
- There are no other usages of
dockerClient.Restart
that might be affected by this change.- The
Restart
method implementation is consistent with this new usage.- Any config-related handling has been appropriately adjusted in the
Restart
method or its callers.✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The removal of the
cfg
parameter indockerClient.Restart
is consistent across the codebase and properly handled internally. No issues found with configuration handling.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of dockerClient.Restart and potential config handling in the Restart method # Test 1: Search for other usages of dockerClient.Restart echo "Searching for other usages of dockerClient.Restart:" rg --type go 'dockerClient\.Restart' # Test 2: Check the implementation of the Restart method echo "Checking the implementation of the Restart method:" rg --type go 'func \(.*\) Restart\(' # Test 3: Look for any config-related code in the Restart method or its callers echo "Searching for config-related code in Restart method or its callers:" rg --type go -e 'func \(.*\) Restart\(' -e 'dockerClient\.Restart' -A 10 -B 10 | rg 'config|cfg'Length of output: 955
common/teacmd/git.go (3)
35-42
: LGTM! Environment variables for Git committer info added.The addition of environment variables for Git committer information successfully addresses the issue mentioned in the PR objectives. This ensures consistent authorship for commits made through the CLI without requiring users to configure their Git settings beforehand.
Line range hint
1-204
: Overall assessment: Changes successfully address PR objectives.The modifications in this file effectively resolve the Git configuration issues mentioned in the PR objectives. The addition of environment variables for Git committer information and the use of the
--author
flag in the commit command ensure consistent authorship for commits made through the CLI without requiring users to configure their Git settings beforehand.These changes align well with the PR objectives and provide a robust solution to the reported issues.
104-104
: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)LGTM! Author flag added to commit command.
The update to use the
--author
flag in the commit command is consistent with the changes made in thegit
function and addresses the issue described in the PR objectives.For consistency with the
git
function, consider using the same values for the author name and email:_, err = git("commit", "--author=\"World CLI <no-reply@world.dev>\"", "-m", initMsg)This ensures that the author information is consistent throughout the file.
cmd/world/evm/start.go (3)
53-53
: LGTM: SimplifieddockerClient.Start
callThe simplification of the
dockerClient.Start
method call aligns with the updated method signature, removing thecfg
parameter. This change improves code clarity and maintainability.
84-84
: LGTM: Consistent simplification ofdockerClient.Start
callThe simplification of the
dockerClient.Start
method call in thevalidateDevDALayer
function is consistent with the changes made in thestartCmd
function. This maintains code consistency and aligns with the updated method signature.
Line range hint
1-184
: Overall assessment: Consistent refactoring with minor concernThe changes in this file demonstrate a consistent effort to update Docker client method calls, aligning with simplified method signatures. This refactoring improves code clarity and maintainability across the file.
Key points:
- The
dockerClient.Start
method calls have been consistently updated to remove thecfg
parameter.- The changes are applied uniformly in both the
startCmd
andvalidateDevDALayer
functions.The only concern is the use of
context.Background()
in thestartCmd
function for stopping the DA service, which has been addressed in a previous comment.These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to streamline Docker client interactions throughout the codebase.
cmd/world/root/create.go (2)
11-11
: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import for the
editor
package is correctly added and aligns with the changes in theUpdate
method.
127-127
: LGTM: Cardinal Editor setup function updated correctly.The change from
teacmd.SetupCardinalEditor
toeditor.SetupCardinalEditor
is consistent with the new import statement and maintains the same function signature. This change aligns with the PR objectives, particularly addressing the issue WORLD-1189 regarding the correct placement of the.editor/
directory.To ensure the change is implemented correctly throughout the codebase, please run the following script:
common/docker/client_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-246
: Overall, the changes look good with room for minor improvements.The refactoring to instantiate the Docker client within each test function and the explicit use of contexts improve the code structure and clarity. The changes are consistent throughout the file and align with good testing practices.
To further enhance the code:
- Consider using named contexts with timeouts across all test functions for better traceability and control.
- Improve error handling in goroutines, especially in the TestStartUndetach function.
- Implement a timeout context for cleanup operations to prevent potential test hangs.
These suggestions will make the tests more robust and easier to debug. Great job on the refactoring!
common/editor/editor.go (2)
80-81
: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.The changes correctly implement the use of
EditorDir
in file operations, maintaining consistency with the constant renaming. The functionality remains intact.As suggested in a previous review, consider wrapping the errors returned from these functions with additional context using
eris.Wrap
. This would provide more informative error messages if issues occur during these operations. For example:-err = copyDir(editorDir, targetEditorDir) +err = eris.Wrap(copyDir(editorDir, targetEditorDir), "failed to copy editor directory") if err != nil { return err }This suggestion applies to lines 103, 111, and 117 as well.
Also applies to: 83-83, 89-89
25-25
: LGTM! Verify usage across the codebase.The renaming of
TargetEditorDir
toEditorDir
is consistent and maintains the same value. This change improves clarity in the code.To ensure this change doesn't break any existing functionality, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
TargetEditorDir
in the codebase:If the script returns any results, those occurrences should be updated to use
EditorDir
instead.✅ Verification successful
Verified: No remaining usage of
TargetEditorDir
found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of TargetEditorDir in the codebase # Search for TargetEditorDir in all Go files echo "Searching for TargetEditorDir in Go files:" rg --type go "TargetEditorDir" # Search for TargetEditorDir in other file types (excluding go.mod and go.sum) echo "Searching for TargetEditorDir in other files:" rg --type-not go --glob '!{go.mod,go.sum}' "TargetEditorDir"Length of output: 287
common/docker/client_network.go (4)
6-11
: Imports are correctly addedThe necessary packages for the multispinner component and styling have been imported appropriately.
16-17
: Ensure cancellation of context to prevent resource leaksThe
cancel
function returned bycontext.WithCancel(ctx)
is not called, which could lead to resource leaks. It's good practice to defer the cancellation to ensure that resources are released when the operation is complete.
42-45
: RenamenetworkExist
tonetworkExists
for clarityConsider renaming the variable
networkExist
tonetworkExists
to improve readability and adhere to standard naming conventions.
83-84
: Avoid potential deadlock when reading fromerrChan
If no error is sent to
errChan
, reading from it using<-errChan
could cause a deadlock because the main goroutine may block indefinitely waiting for a value. Ensure that the goroutine always sends a value toerrChan
, even when there is no error.common/docker/client_volume.go (1)
15-96
: LGTM!The
processVolume
function effectively refactors volume management by consolidating creation and removal operations into a single method. The implementation is clean, well-structured, and aligns with Go best practices.cmd/world/cardinal/start.go (1)
123-126
: SimplifieddockerClient.Start
method call withoutcfg
parameterThe removal of the
cfg
parameter from thedockerClient.Start
method call simplifies the service startup process. This change appears appropriate, assuming that theDockerClient
now internally manages any necessary configuration for the services.common/docker/client.go (6)
18-23
: Missing declaration ofprocessType
.The type
processType
is used in theconst
block but is not declared. This will result in a compilation error.
75-76
: Consider using the original context in defer function.In the
defer
block within theStart
method, you're usingcontext.Background()
when callingc.Stop()
. To ensure that any cancellations or timeouts from the original context are respected during cleanup, consider using the originalctx
instead.
109-111
: Add unit tests for error handling in image building.The error handling code for
buildImages
is not covered by unit tests. Adding tests will ensure that failures during the image-building process are properly handled.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 109-111: common/docker/client.go#L109-L111
Added lines #L109 - L111 were not covered by tests
118-118
: Add unit tests for error handling when starting containers.The error handling code when starting containers is not covered by unit tests. Please consider adding tests to ensure that any issues during the container starting process are detected and managed appropriately.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 118-118: common/docker/client.go#L118
Added line #L118 was not covered by tests
140-140
: Add unit tests for error handling when stopping containers.The error handling code when stopping containers lacks unit test coverage. Adding tests will help verify that failures during the container stopping process are correctly handled.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 140-140: common/docker/client.go#L140
Added line #L140 was not covered by tests
157-157
: Add unit tests for error handling when removing containers.The error handling code when removing containers is not covered by unit tests. Consider adding tests to ensure proper handling of failures during the container removal process.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 157-157: common/docker/client.go#L157
Added line #L157 was not covered by testscmd/world/cardinal/dev.go (2)
135-154
: Proper handling of context cancellation while waiting for RedisThe use of a
select
statement allows the function to exit gracefully if the context is canceled while waiting for Redis to become available. This ensures that the application can shut down promptly in response to cancellation signals.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 137-138: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L137-L138
Added lines #L137 - L138 were not covered by tests
[warning] 150-150: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by tests
251-252
: Effective error handling when starting RedisCancelling the context when
dockerClient.Start
fails ensures that all dependent processes are notified promptly, allowing for appropriate cleanup and termination.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 252-252: cmd/world/cardinal/dev.go#L252
Added line #L252 was not covered by testscommon/editor/editor_test.go (1)
343-345
: Simplify error handling incleanUpDir
The
cleanUpDir
function now succinctly returns the error fromos.RemoveAll
, which is a clean and effective approach. This simplification improves readability and aligns with Go best practices.common/docker/client_image.go (7)
26-27
: Imports are correctly addedThe added imports for
multispinner
andstyle
packages are necessary for the spinner functionality and styling in the terminal UI.
30-108
:buildImages
function correctly implements concurrent image buildingThe new
buildImages
function efficiently builds multiple Docker images concurrently using goroutines and manages progress display withmultispinner
. The use of context with cancellation ensures that the build process can be gracefully stopped if needed. Error handling and aggregation are appropriately implemented.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: common/docker/client_image.go#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
[warning] 32-39: common/docker/client_image.go#L32-L39
Added lines #L32 - L39 were not covered by tests
[warning] 43-44: common/docker/client_image.go#L43-L44
Added lines #L43 - L44 were not covered by tests
[warning] 48-48: common/docker/client_image.go#L48
Added line #L48 was not covered by tests
[warning] 51-51: common/docker/client_image.go#L51
Added line #L51 was not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: common/docker/client_image.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 55-55: common/docker/client_image.go#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: common/docker/client_image.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
[warning] 59-64: common/docker/client_image.go#L59-L64
Added lines #L59 - L64 were not covered by tests
[warning] 67-78: common/docker/client_image.go#L67-L78
Added lines #L67 - L78 were not covered by tests
[warning] 80-80: common/docker/client_image.go#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests
[warning] 83-85: common/docker/client_image.go#L83-L85
Added lines #L83 - L85 were not covered by tests
55-58
: Proper capture of loop variables in goroutinesCapturing the loop variable
dockerService
by assigning it to a new variable within the loop prevents potential issues with variable shadowing and ensures that each goroutine operates on the correct service.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 55-55: common/docker/client_image.go#L55
Added line #L55 was not covered by tests
[warning] 57-57: common/docker/client_image.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
83-86
: Error handling inreadBuildLog
invocationErrors returned by
readBuildLog
are correctly sent toerrChan
for aggregation. This ensures that any issues encountered during log reading are properly reported.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 83-85: common/docker/client_image.go#L83-L85
Added lines #L83 - L85 were not covered by tests
227-246
: Enhanced error propagation in build log parsing functionsThe updated
parseBuildkitResp
andparseNonBuildkitResp
functions now return errors, improving error detection and reporting during the build process. This enhancement aids in troubleshooting and maintaining robust error handling.
271-300
: Correct handling of BuildKit response inparseBuildkitResp
The function successfully extracts and returns the name of the current build vertex, which aids in providing detailed progress updates. Error handling is properly managed to ensure that any decoding issues are addressed.
Line range hint
303-321
: Accurate parsing of non-BuildKit responses inparseNonBuildkitResp
The function correctly identifies build steps and handles errors by returning them for further processing. This ensures that both progress updates and errors are appropriately managed during non-BuildKit builds.
Closes: WORLD-1177, WORLD-1189
Overview
When user trying to exec
world create
but git configuration.gitconfig
for username and password is not configured it will be returned error, but the gameshard dir is already created.The issue is because on the last step of
world create
it will exec git commit, and it will need username and email to be configured in.gitconfig
Fix some PR review bug and changes :
world cardinal dev
command if docker container is not runningBrief Changelog
world cardinal dev
Testing and Verifying
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MultiSpinner
component for visual feedback during multiple concurrent processes.editor
package.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores