-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add new az ad app permissions grant and list commands for OAuth2 permissions for AAD registered apps #6975
Closed
Closed
Add new az ad app permissions grant and list commands for OAuth2 permissions for AAD registered apps #6975
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please double check this is needed? appid and app id uri are both service principal names which the existing query below should cover it. I did a quick check just now for reference, but let me know if you do need it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yugangw-msft I can confirm that the appId can be the same as the objectId, but it is not always. In all of my test cases, like for example creating an app in the portal, the SP associated with the app will be autogenerated and needs to be searched for by the appId. The code is definitely needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
object id is irrelevant here which is different thing from the app id. I am talking about the app id of the application. The service principal provisioned in the tenant for the application should have the app id as part of the
servicePrincipalNames
array. If you see the appid is not in theservicePrincipalNames
of the SP then your change is definitely needed. To get my comment clear, I am talking about the following array in the SP objectThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yugangw-msft Not sure if I am missing something here, this is the flow:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The flow is right. My comment is on step 5 that you don't need to update
_resolve_service_principal
to take a new argument ofappid
, rather just pass the app id to the existing argument ofidentifier
which should work.The reason is the
_resolve_service_principal
queries for SP usingservicePrincipalNames
, andappid
is one of service principal name, so the query should just work.If you have tried but not working, please let me know
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yugangw-msft , thank you, in my tests this was not working for me. Will try again
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks. Is it easy for you to share a repro for me to try out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yugangw-msft , you are right - my tests were bad, will remove appId from query and rebase