Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Add ability to checkout trees #233

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

Add ability to checkout trees #233

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

hateofhades
Copy link
Contributor

@hateofhades hateofhades commented Dec 26, 2024

Pull Request Overview

This pull request closes #51.

Author

Signed-off-by: Andrei Serban - andrei.serban@brewingbytes.com

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new method to retrieve all blob entries from a Git tree and its subtrees, enhancing the management of Git objects within projects.
    • Enhanced GitBlob struct to support cloning, improving usability in various contexts.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in the git_tree.rs file introduce a new method get_object_blobs to the GitTree struct. This method enhances the ability to retrieve blob entries from a Git tree, including those nested within subtrees. It constructs a vector of tuples with blob names and their corresponding GitBlob entries, ensuring comprehensive access to Git objects while incorporating error handling. Additionally, the GitBlob struct in git_blob.rs is updated to derive the Clone trait, allowing for the cloning of GitBlob instances.

Changes

File Change Summary
src-tauri/src/git/git_tree.rs Added get_object_blobs method to GitTree struct for recursive blob retrieval from current and nested trees.
src-tauri/src/git/git_blob.rs Updated GitBlob struct to derive Clone trait, enabling cloning of GitBlob instances.

Poem

🐰 In the forest of Git's grand design,
Blobs hide in trees, line by line,
Recursive rabbit hops with glee,
Uncovering secrets, setting data free!
A magical journey through code's domain 🌳


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0fcfc8 and b171926.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src-tauri/src/git/git_blob.rs (1 hunks)
  • src-tauri/src/git/git_tree.rs (2 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src-tauri/src/git/git_tree.rs (2)

152-152: Consider returning a result to handle tree-loading errors explicitly
The method returns an empty tree (unwrap_or_default()) when an error occurs loading a subtree. Swallowing errors might conceal underlying issues (e.g., corrupted data or permission problems). Consider returning these errors or logging them for better debuggability.


155-165: Use a for-loop instead of map to avoid confusion
Here, map is only used for its side effects (pushing blobs into the objects vector), which is unconventional. A simple for-loop is more idiomatic and clears up intent.

- let _ = self.get_trees().iter().map(|tree| {
-     let tree_obj = GitTree::from_hash(project, &tree.hash).unwrap_or_default();
-     let _ = tree_obj.get_blobs().iter().map(|blob| {
-         let obj = GitBlob::from_hash(project, &blob.hash);
-         if let Ok(obj) = obj {
-             objects.push(obj);
-         }
-     });
- });
+ for tree in self.get_trees().iter() {
+     let tree_obj = GitTree::from_hash(project, &tree.hash).unwrap_or_default();
+     for blob in tree_obj.get_blobs().iter() {
+         if let Ok(git_blob) = GitBlob::from_hash(project, &blob.hash) {
+             objects.push(git_blob);
+         }
+     }
+ }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5395a2 and d0fcfc8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src-tauri/src/git/git_tree.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src-tauri/src/git/git_tree.rs (2)

3-7: Add references for new functionality
The newly imported modules git_blob::GitBlob and git_project::GitProject are essential for the recursive blob retrieval logic below. No issues here—this import block is consistent with the newly introduced method that references these types.


159-164: Surface or log blob-fetch failures
When a blob fails to load, the code silently skips it. Consider logging the error or returning it to alert users of potential data issues.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #233      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.60%   93.58%   -1.03%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        3208     3243      +35     
==========================================
  Hits         3035     3035              
- Misses        173      208      +35     
Components Coverage Δ
rust 93.58% <0.00%> (-1.03%) ⬇️

@hateofhades hateofhades merged commit 4bdf048 into main Dec 26, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@hateofhades hateofhades deleted the feat/checkout-trees branch December 26, 2024 14:26
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 26, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Be able to set the correct files from trees
1 participant